Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NOW who wrote (57105)	10/19/2002 9:26:42 PM
From: UnBelievable	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

The Federal Reserve Was Created By The Banksters For the Banksters. And that is not cynicism its fact. There was a thread that was active for a while about the Federal Reserve and the Money Supply. It has not been very active but there are some useful referances to a number of books and articles about the history of the Fed. The story of how and why the Federal Reserve came to be is fairly clear. But its not really a problem since what's good for JPM is good for the country. <gg>

To: NOW who wrote (57105)	10/20/2002 1:57:08 PM
From: GraceZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

The transfer of wealth that the above firms are trying to make is between each other. The bulk of the money at any given time resides within the confines of the biggest market dealers. The public traders like you guys here in total amounts to a rounding error in any one of those firms P&Ls. How the hell do you get people who are fiercely trying to steal money off each other to cooperate to take the market in one direction or another? The fact that they tend to move in concert has more to do with the fact that they understand that it is far more profitable to ride the horse in the direction it's going, whether up or down. The fact that the Fed coordinates its market actions with the member banks has to do with doing the job it was chartered to do. You can look at the RPs and try to make a connection between them and market action and there is, but what most miss with their conspiracy bias is that it isn't causal. A rally creates increased demand for funds, an increase in instantaneous demand for funds raises interest rates. The Fed defends its interest rate target with temporary infusions, RPs. So which comes first the rally, the increased demand for loanable funds or the RP? If you were to track the futures movements against the day's action I think you'd find that they are just as frequently wrong in predicting the day's market action as they are right. Otherwise one would be entirely justified in simply watching the futures and placing your bets for the day. I dare say you wouldn't last long with that particular strategy.