SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (53536)10/20/2002 8:37:18 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
DC Sniper Analysis

By Mark Day - Sierra Times Staff
Published 10. 18. 02 at 23:06 Sierra Time

The shootings that have taken place have a number of common factors, as follows:

1. All have taken place within an area 30 miles across 2. All have taken place in public areas/around public facilities 3. All have involved a single shot fired 4. Most have involved adults middle aged or older 5. Most have had reports of two males leaving the area in a white or light colored vehicle 6. Many have taken place near a Michael's craft store 7. Law enforcement authorities seemingly are having little impact on the shooters activities

Targets seemingly are chosen at random, and are apparently targets of opportunity, rather than specifically chosen as to sex, identifiable profession (for example, police or other uniformed workers) etc. Even with police searches taking place shortly after most shootings, the shooter or shooters have not been apprehended, implying a planned escape route based on location. All the areas where shootings took place have been near major roadways, also suggesting preplanning of escape routes.

The fact that these shootings are being carried out in the area that they are, in my opinion, indicates a possible terrorist link. The area is the very near (in one case actually in) the Nation's capitol, where there is a high concentration of police agencies, military command functions, etc. What better place to demonstrate the ability to strike at the heart of ones enemies than in their own seat of government?

The fact that one or two people (based on reporting) have been able to generate such fear in the local population, even without the common "taking credit" that has so often been associated with terrorist attacks may well indicate a much more military view of making such attacks. If a terrorist organization had long range plans to strike at the U.S. it would be well served to shed tactics that have been common to terrorists in the past. By using tactics that have not been used before such an organization could, for little cost, escalate their effectiveness.

The fact that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were so different from commonly used terrorist tactics is an indication of at least a realignment of the view of terror tactics by those who employ such methods.

The choice of caliber may have been made to make ballistic matches difficult, due to the light construction of .223 size bullets. This size bullet is frangible (breaks up easily) especially at high velocities. The fragile nature of these bullets can make ballistic matches more difficult as they are very often damaged by striking a substantial target- persons, animals, vehicles, walls, etc. If chosen for this feature, it would allow the use of more than one firearm or type of firearm, and still leave the identification of the class of ammunition possible due to the level of damage to the bullet (indicator of velocity), the size bullet (.224" diameter bullets range from 40 grains to 80 grains in weight with 55 grain bullets being most common). There are several cartridges which fit into the range of the .223 Remington, any of which might be being used- the police have stated that the rounds used are .223, but the police also hold information from the press and public in the course of investigations routinely for some very good reasons (and at times not so good ones as well).

The weapon or weapons being used may have been chosen for this feature of the ammunition, and as well because of the common availability (if in fact the weapon/weapons being used are .223 Remington [also known as 5.56x45 NATO] this ammunition is used in the U.S. military M16 as well as NATO member nations arms, many common hunting and target firearms, including three or more commercially available handguns). This also applies to some other cartridges in this class with the exception of their use as military standard rounds. The .223 caliber is used in short range sniper/counter sniper applications by the U.S. armed services, including the JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command- special forces), some U.S. police agencies/departments. The common availability of the ammunition and arms chambered for it may have influenced the choice to use it.

The commercial availability of other rounds in this class makes them viable possibilities, and does not make the .223 round the only possibility. This being said if the police statements that the .223 Remington is the round in use by the shooter or shooters is the complete and total truth (and it is possible- there are methods by which cartridges can be- mostly- reliably identified even without the case that the bullet was fired from) there is the possibility that other rounds in this class might be used in future shootings to confuse the issue.

The attacks are quite possibly the work of foreign terrorists such as Al Qaeda. This possibility cannot be discounted due to the disruption of social structure, which would be of benefit to terrorist organizations, as well as giving them the opportunity to observe the reactions and techniques of the police in response to the shootings.

The shooter may be a "thrill killer", however I feel that the probability of that is less than of an organized campaign due to the lack of identifiers associated with deranged individuals that commit these types of crimes.

Some features of the shootings that I feel are solid indicators that the shootings are not being carried out by a "professional" sniper are as follows:

1. The first shooting to be associated with this series of attacks was at a Michael's craft store- the shot fired was through a window and hit no one. A well trained marksman is aware of the effects that firing through glass have on the flight path of a bullet (especially a high velocity light weight bullet). A well trained operator would not have made such a poor shot- the snipers motto is "one shot, one kill".

2. A trained marksman (sniper) regards his job as the saving of lives. To commit such random shootings is highly offensive to the professionalism of such marksmen, because it is diametrically opposed to the purpose of a professional. A "real" sniper fires his weapon with the purpose of saving the lives of those they are charged to protect- this is true regardless of whether the marksman in question is a military sniper, or a law enforcement "designated marksman". (There is at least one notable exception to this- the shooting of Vicki Weaver by FBI HRU sniper Lon Horiuchi- I personally believe that the shooting of Mrs. Weaver was an aberation, and NOT typical of the behavior of a professional marksman).

3. The overwhelming choice for a basic sniper rifle is a bolt action rifle chambered for the .308 Winchester (7.62x51 NATO). The reasons for this are many, including the inherent accuracy of the cartridge, the inherent accuracy of a bolt action rifle, the ease of configuration of such a rifle for high accuracy, the advantages of range of the cartridge (a .223 caliber cartridge is limited in range to 500 yards or less, whereas a .308 is useful out to 1200 yards or more).

4. The semiautomatic rifles commonly chambered for .223 Remington are in general much smaller and therefore more concealable than a "real" sniper rifle, and the .223 is also much easier to use in a pistol chambered for it- offering even more concealability, with relatively less effort being required to master such a firearm than if it (a pistol) were chambered for .308 Winchester.

The fact that the shooter or shooters are in my opinion very unlikely to be well trained professional snipers does not mean that they are incapable of carrying out their agenda. What it does mean is that professionals are predictable- amateurs are the dangerous ones. It also does not mean any comfort can be taken in the fact that the person or persons commiting these acts is not a well trained expert. Even beginners and amateurs can be very good at something and may learn quickly from their errors.

I feel that it may be possible that these shootings could be the work of a "lone nut"- if so the shootings will continue in a similar "patternless" pattern. However I feel perhaps from just a weight of evidence (I have read over 250 pages of material regarding these shootings, and on the subject matter of sniping in the few days I have spent preparing this) that it will turn out that these are the actions of enemies of our nation, and people, that are commiting these crimes. If this is the case, the shootings are unlikely to remain centered in the Washington D.C. area, and more attacks will be forthcoming. Further, the nature of the attacks are likely to change and may not be recognized at first for what they are and are almost certain to be portrayed as "other than terrorist attacks" in the mainstream media.

© 2002 SierraTimes.com

sierratimes.com



To: JohnM who wrote (53536)10/21/2002 1:28:21 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 281500
 
An analysis of why North Korea did it. Because they really want to be friends? I think this is the leaked State Department line.

October 21, 2002
North Korea's Confession: Why?
By HOWARD W. FRENCH

[T] OKYO, Oct. 20 ? When the United States announced last week that North Korean officials had acknowledged the existence of a secret nuclear weapons program in violation of a 1994 accord, a simple question could be heard echoing around the world: What were the North Koreans thinking?

With a tightly controlled, highly secretive country that is home to the world's only Communist dynasty, the temptation of outsiders to write off North Korea's leaders as crackpot Machiavellis or scarily unpredictable weirdoes is sometimes irresistible.

Many close watchers of North Korean affairs, however, say that for all of the leadership's eccentricities, the decisions are seldom outright irrational. Experts who disagree on many other matters concerning North Korea say decision making in the country whose future holds the key to peace and stability in northeast Asia is driven by an impulse for survival amid ever constricting options.

"A lot of people have interpreted the announcement by North Korea of its uranium enrichment program as a sudden tactical move, perhaps trying to take advantage of the fact that the United States is preoccupied with Iraq," said Victor D. Cha, a Korea expert at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. "But that's not the case at all. This was a case where Washington simply had the goods on them, and Pyongyang just didn't see any other way out."

For years, North Korea has perfected a kind of bloodcurdling official polemics used by the national radio and newspapers to denounce the United States, South Korea and Japan, and to warn its enemies that they will suffer humiliating defeat if they dare attack.

In fact, North Korea experts say, the tone has grown harsher in almost direct proportion to the country's underlying insecurity. Since the early 1980's, when it was still at rough economic parity with its capitalist rival, South Korea, North Korea's situation has grown steadily more precarious.

The late 1980's opened an era of disasters, from the disappearance of the Soviet bloc, whose countries were North Korea's main economic partners, to a series of catastrophic famines brought on by crop failures, droughts and flooding.

Against this backdrop, the United States, the North's great historical enemy, has emerged as the world's sole superpower, and one increasingly willing to move against nations it sees as threats. In another nightmare come true, South Korea, meanwhile, has become vastly richer.

Even China, long the ever dependable ally, has taken more distance from North Korea lately, as witnessed last month by Beijing's arrest of a Chinese investor who had just been handpicked by Pyongyang to oversee a newly announced capitalist enterprise zone.

Lacking in generous friends at a time when the economy is crumbling, the country's leader, Kim Jong Il, is facing a moment of unusual vulnerability. He has already introduced major reforms aimed at opening the economy, but he appears increasingly unable to resist pressures for more far-reaching changes. Among those changes, some experts say, may be the recent trend toward diplomacy by confession.

Faced with the urgent need to fend off economic collapse, Mr. Kim's confession of a uranium-based nuclear weapons program appears to many experts to have been a pragmatic, if ultimately misguided response to an insurmountable obstacle: a Bush Administration that had little interest in engagement.

Admission of the nuclear program rather than denial, appears to have been intended to "persuade the world that Kim Jong Il is a new kind of leader, and his leadership does not resort to terrorist means, or secrecy," said Han S. Park, director of the Center for the Study of Global Issues at the University of Georgia.

Mr. Kim tried the same approach last month, when he was host for a meeting with Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi of Japan. Faced with Japanese demands for an explanation of the disappearance of 11 of its citizens in the late 1970's, the North Korean leader bluntly reversed a long tradition of angry denial, and apologized for what he acknowledged were official kidnappings.

Initially, the admission seemed to propel North Korean-Japanese relations strongly forward, with widespread expectations of rapidly normalized ties and large-scale aid from Japan. As the sordid details of the kidnappings have sunk in here, though, Mr. Koizumi has been forced by sensitive public opinion to be far more cautious.

North Korea desperately needs better relations with the Japan and the United States because the former has long promised to provide heavy development assistance once relations are normalized, while the latter controls many of the international financial institutions, whose cooperation is indispensable to North Korea's re-entry into the global economy.

Looking at his confessions, Mr. Kim appears to have focused on the issues most important to each of those two nations: the emotive question of the fate of its citizens for Japan, and weapons of mass destruction for the United States.

"North Korea has always wanted to pursue normalization with the United States, and however awkwardly, now they are bargaining," said Selig S. Harrison, director of the National Security Program at the Center for International Policy in Washington. "What they are saying is that they are prepared to negotiate an end to all nuclear activity and allow inspections, if we agree to two things: not to threaten them militarily and to pursue normalized relations."

Mr. Harrison, who is the author of "Korean Endgame: A Strategy for Reunification and U.S. Disengagement," said Pyongyang's position was spelled out to him this week by the country's representative to the United Nations.

Whether or not North Korea seeks to negotiate with Washington along these lines, its acknowledgment of a nuclear weapons program has inflicted faster and far graver setbacks than the missing persons issue with Japan.

"This is not a crisis yet, but it may be the last stage before a crisis," Mr. Cha said. "This administration is not going to pay to go inspect another hole in the ground, and whatever happens, it is not going to be framed as an exchange, where everyone gives up something to obtain Pyongyang's cooperation."