SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: re3 who wrote (149004)10/20/2002 8:13:46 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
That's not what he said. He said it would have been a war crime because it was prohibited, explicitly, by UN resolutions. He can't find a thing to substantiate that claim, so he just says "everyone knows it."

Of course there was no mandate - no mandate from the people back home. But deciding not to do it does not make doing it illegal.



To: re3 who wrote (149004)10/21/2002 10:44:14 AM
From: GST  Respond to of 164684
 
Message 18137627



To: re3 who wrote (149004)10/21/2002 10:48:07 AM
From: GST  Respond to of 164684
 
retired: This is all common knowledge. We would not be looking for UN authorization for an invasion of Iraq now if it had been any other way. I can't believe the time wasted here just to substantiate the obvious. Perhaps other posters want to avoid dealing with the real issues and prefer to cloud the issue as much as possible.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News