Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (53557)	10/21/2002 11:36:47 AM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Here's another article re defense spending before 9/11, after which it was carte blanche. At the time..."Bush's huge tax cut has reduced the Administration's fiscal flexibility and may leave Rumsfeld's budget looking a lot like the much-loathed Clinton blueprint" AUGUST 6, 2001 businessweek.com Washington Outlook Edited by Richard S. Dunham Why the Hawks Are Carpet-Bombing Rumsfeld When George W. Bush unveiled his Administration team, three Washington veterans stood out as guaranteed superstars: Vice-President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. Six months in, two of the three have lived up to expectations. Then there's Rumsfeld. The ex-CEO of G.D. Searle & Co. had bold plans to build a high-tech military, push a missile defense system, and cut costs. But all he has done so far is alienate the military brass, defense industry execs, and Congress. While jabs from the Left were predictable, what's surprising is the thunder on the Right--including one leading conservative's suggestion that he resign. "There is almost nobody in this town who is not tearing him to pieces," says a senior GOP congressional aide. Why has Rumsfeld struggled? For starters, candidate Bush set unrealistically high expectations for a quick, radical Pentagon overhaul. What's more, the glacial pace of picking and confirming aides has left Rumsfeld shorthanded. But he has aggravated matters with what one conservative defense analyst calls an "autocratic" management style and a "chaotic" internal review of defense strategy. At this point, the analyst added, Rumsfeld has "severely undermined any Republican claim to superior competence in defense management." TAX-CUT INFECTION. All of this angers GOP defense hawks, who saw Bush's election as a blank check to rebuild a military they felt Bill Clinton had decimated. Trouble is, Bush's huge tax cut has reduced the Administration's fiscal flexibility and may leave Rumsfeld's budget looking a lot like the much-loathed Clinton blueprint. After months of wrangling with White House bean counters, for example, Rumsfeld got only half of the extra $10 billion he had sought for 2001. His request for $55 billion more in 2002 was slashed to $33 billion--and it's far from certain he'll get that. Conservatives think his $329 billion budget request for 2002 is insufficient. William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard, has called on Rumsfeld to resign to highlight "the impending evisceration of the American military." He frets that Bush could become "the President who fiddled with tax cuts while the military burned." A string of other decisions has irked the Right. Rumsfeld repudiated an aide's memo that suggested breaking off military contacts with China. His Navy Secretary halted training exercises off Vieques, in Puerto Rico--a move condemned by the American Conservative Union and other GOP hawks. And conservatives were outraged by an Air Force decision to cut the B-1 bomber fleet by a third. Critics say Rumsfeld hasn't put a high enough priority on consulting with Capitol Hill allies. Rumsfeld's contempt for Congress may be deserved, says the GOP staffer, "but if he acts that way, Congress will make it impossible for him to do the things he wants to do." In Rumsfeld's defense, everyone concedes remaking the Pentagon is a daunting task. And while he admits his budget is no cure-all, "it's the largest increase since 1986, in the heyday of the Reagan Administration." Conservative Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) adds that change takes time, so Rumsfeld should be "judged on the goals he is putting in place and not the accomplishments he has already made." So far, the White House is standing firmly behind Rumsfeld. But some conservatives are starting to believe the Administration is pursuing a "Let them eat Star Wars" approach toward GOP hawks. And they're losing patience with a Defense chief they increasingly believe is unwilling--or unable--to deliver the Reaganesque military revival they had expected. By Stan Crock