To: JHP who wrote (24422 ) 10/21/2002 1:14:08 PM From: LLCF Respond to of 74559 <your thinking this year is no better then your insulting arguments with Flatsville during the California energy crisis> My thinking is what it is... again you really seemed to be attached to it. Why not ignore it? <where she repeatedly pointed out to you that the energy companies were stealing!> My whole premise was that the companies probably didn't break the 'letter of the law'... don't know if that's been proven wrong or not... if so, I was wrong about it. Bad thinking?? What ever. <And you the great thinker kept insulting her and called her stupid,now have you ever apoloigised to her for you getting it 100% wrong?> No, not stupid... always grinding a political axe and attempting to show the world how her brand was right and others wrong?? Yes, that would be my interpretation. Apologize?? For what, pointing that out to her?? Looks like she's moved on to a using her time more wisely to me... maybe she'll thank me! <Now all you want to do is appease enemies of your country> Appease? Did I say we should give them something to stop them from doing something else? No, that's what's been going on all along, especially in the ME. I think we should turn the other cheek, and get our own house in order, morally speaking. Lot's of work to be done, which the present situation is being used to ignore IMO. <with foolish thoughts like what is is,thinking the US has no power to change muslims beliefs that they are going to take over.> Not sure what you're saying... but I'll go with what I think it is and answer this: When there is disagreement and emotions rise in life... the way to see the truth in the situation and act in a proper way is ALWAYS to wait for clarity to return... instant reaction and use of force is the antithesis of this, increasing emotions and reducing clarity. <didn`t your mother teach you to wear a condom?> No. Didn't your mom teach you to just 'be' with your emotions during such times rather than lash out or hide them away? <dak what is the root problem? > This seems a pretty concise description of a [the?] main one:Message 18120730 DAK