SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (171684)10/21/2002 2:54:30 PM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Good enough. 1995 earnings were $3,566mm.

If you use the 10% discount factor and the 5% earnings growth rate in my pervious example, you'd get a market cap of $71 billion, about 20% below the current figure.

To fix the numbers to get to the current market cap, all you'd need to do is cut the discount rate by 1.25% or raise the long term growth rate by 1.25%, or some combination thereof. And a 6.25% long term growth rate of earnings for Intel isn't too unreasonable; neither is a long term discount rate of 8.75%.

My point here isn't as much to state that Intel is a screaming buy as it is to show that anyone buying Intel here is making a decision on some pretty rational assumptions. That wasn't the case three years ago; the assumptions used by most people to value Intel were irrational at that time.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (171684)10/22/2002 11:54:19 AM
From: TGPTNDR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jorj, Re: <not to pick nits, but I have the bubble starting in December of 1994...so let's use the 1995 number.>

Sounds reasonable.

Compare it to the actual earnings growth rate over those last 6 years( That sounds to me like a reasonable 'long term'. ) and let me know what 'reasonable' valuation you come up with.

-tgp