Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elpolvo who wrote (17682)	10/22/2002 9:36:47 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 104155

<<...you can't ask or expect the rest of the world to respect or abide by international law if you won't subject your own self to it...>> el DJ: You're RIGHT ON TARGET with that comment. I wish Dubya had you as an advisor...=) -el S2

To: elpolvo who wrote (17682)	10/22/2002 11:01:39 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 104155

It's enough to make you sick By Molly Ivins Syndicated Columnist Posted on Sun, Oct. 20, 2002 Star-Telegram Have you had a terrible stomach illness lately? It's quite likely that you should blame the Bush administration. I know, that sounds like some demented spoof of left-wing paranoia, but it's actually an especially visceral example of one of life's iron rules: You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to. Unless you have reason to suspect that your nearest and dearest are putting arsenic in your food, your bad stomach probably was caused by tainted meat. It is not hard to connect the dots on this one -- the massive meat recalls of recent months have now culminated in the largest in the nation's history: 27.4 million pounds due to suspected contamination by the killer bacteria listeria. According to the Reuters news service, the listeria outbreak in the Northeast has so far caused 23 deaths, and that is not particularly unusual. According to government data, contaminated food causes more than 76 million illnesses and 5,000 deaths annually. How's that for homeland security? Consumer advocates put the blame on Bush's "industry-friendly" U.S. Department of Agriculture. Carol Tucker Foreman, director of the Food Policy Institute at the Consumer Federation of America, said that since Bush took office, "there has been a message from USDA that they would give the benefit of the doubt to the industry. … Bush administration officials at USDA have consistently made clear they do not believe meat processors must be held accountable for the safety of meat coming off the end of the line. Since November 2001, the undersecretary for food safety has denigrated pathogen testing and zero tolerance. Both the industry and government have put profit ahead of public health." The Consumer Federation issued another statement Wednesday: "At the urging of industry, the Bush administration's Agriculture Department has refused to take final action on proposed regulations that would require companies to act effectively to prevent Listeria contamination. The proposed rule controlling Listeria in ready-to-eat products was completed at the end of the Clinton administration, held up and then released by the Bush administration. But the comment period on the proposed regulation ended in May 2001, and no further action has been taken." The General Accounting Office, in a report on the USDA issued in July of this year, was as close to scathing as the GAO ever gets. USDA has been running a "model program" based on the ever-batty Bush notion of "voluntary regulation." As I have been pointing out for years, it was a spectacular failure in Texas, and it is not working any better in this case. The GAO found that five of the 11 plants in the pilot project were less successful in controlling salmonella, and only one plant met the standard for eliminating visible fecal contamination. Of the 11 plants, only two had lower salmonella than under the traditional system. "It's a recipe for food poisoning," said the Consumer Federation. So naturally the Agriculture Department decided to expand the program. Foreman said, "This pilot project should be dumped in the garbage along with the dirty chickens it produces. The only reason for the administration to go forward after the GAO report is to give in to the poultry industry's pressure to run their production lines faster. Faster line speeds result in more fecal matter on poultry. Consumers do not want poop on their poultry." So who's in favor of poop on poultry? Surprise -- it's the meat and poultry industry! Industry officials have argued for years that food-poisoning bacteria are natural constituents of raw meat and poultry and that they have no obligation to control them. It's up to the consumer to cook them properly. That would be fine except, as CFA points out, cooking doesn't stop cross-contamination. The pathogens get on everything that the raw meat and poultry touches -- cutting boards, utensils, hands and other foods. In December of last year, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the industry in a case that gutted meat and poultry inspection laws. In the case of Supreme Beef (I'm not responsible for the irony), the court ruled that "because cooking kills Salmonella organisms, the presence of Salmonella in meat products does not render them injurious to health." Which brings us right back to politics, because guess who appoints the judges? After the decision, the Consumer Federation called on Congress to immediately rewrite the 1967 Federal Meat Inspection Act. Sen. Tom HarkIn, who is in a tight race in Iowa, is the leading member of Congress on meat safety issues and is chairman of the relevant committee. And why would politicians take chances with the very lives of their constituents? The Center for Responsive Politics reports that 82 percent of the meat industry's political contributions, $4.5 million since 1990, went to Republicans. To labor the point, it does actually make a real difference in your daily life who winds up in public office. So to all of you who "just don't care about politics," take another bite of chicken and think about it some more. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Molly Ivins writes for Creators Syndicate. 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90045 dfw.com