Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (199243)	10/22/2002 12:16:52 PM
From: who cares?	Respond to of 436258

True, but then you stated that according to what IBM says everything is rosey and it's not a short. Long, or short time readers of this thread will know IBM has a myriad of problems. Try a full text search of "IBM" and "Earlie" that'll get you started, though some of the early better stuff is lost thanks to the decaying performance of the search function here.

To: zonder who wrote (199243)	10/22/2002 12:24:31 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

try this search too.. siliconinvestor.com a quote... Get those hip waders out as any time you dig into IBM's reports, it is a slosh through the sewer pipe -lol- read some of the "to's" and "froms" as well. It draws the picture of why some don't think IBM is a buy...in fact a good short candidate. I'm standing back from it a bit at the moment because "it's needed" up till the elections, perhaps even Christmas. It's my #1 short target though.