Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Senior who wrote (15683)	10/24/2002 12:21:15 AM
From: James Clarke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78507

Doesn't Ashland have asbestos exposure? Correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't done any work on it. I'm learning quickly to stay away from those as even things that look like no-brainers with very slight exposure to asbestos (CR, NSI for example) lose me money every time I stray from a strict no asbestos diet.

To: Paul Senior who wrote (15683)	4/10/2007 11:49:56 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78507

Holly recommended here by the great oracle Forbes: forbes.com "The same kind of investment motivation is what puts several exploration and production companies at the head of the energy pack in attraction here: Holly Corp. (nyse: HOC - news - people ), Southwest Energy (nyse: SWN - news - people ), Toreador Resources (nasdaq: TRGL - news - people ), Range Resources (nyse: RRC - news - people ), Ultra Petroleum (amex: UPL - news - people ) and Swift Energy (nyse: SFY - news - people )." So of course, -g-, I shall continue to trim my Holly position. (In 5/2/00 @ about $1.60; cut 10% 4/09/07 @ 61.75.) finance.yahoo.com And, fwiw, also trimming UPL position (purchases 8/05 @40.73; 9/05 @45.31-55.70; out 55.07-55.80)