Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (63494)	10/23/2002 8:38:15 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Get a grip.

To: epicure who wrote (63494)	10/23/2002 9:18:18 PM
From: E	Respond to of 82486

That is all simply creative writing, fiction, though I believe that in order to attack the victim and align yourself with CH it's one you have convinced yourself is fact. Please tell me what Laz did that was in some way threatening or scary, or iyo intending to be scary, to you. BTW: Laz can be irascible and he has a temper and he can say outrageous things, but if you pay attention, you soon learn that he is an intelligent, kind, principled, trustworthy person with a generous heart. There's a reason so many people like and respect him. He's earned it. Wasn't it funny to you when your friend CH posted a little while ago how much he admired the piece he'd not so very long ago attacked and used as the basis for making up and repeatedly promulgating lies about Poet's having made negative comments about "our boys in uniform"? Odd the people you choose to dislike, and not.

To: epicure who wrote (63494)	10/23/2002 10:03:22 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Imagine the irony of getting a civility lecture from a FAL viper....XXX hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

To: epicure who wrote (63494)	10/24/2002 8:53:26 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I think even Bill would have to agree with that, since we agreed people have a right to act anyway they want, even if we don't agree with them, as long as they don't break the laws. Wrong. I said the opposite of that. People have a right to free speech. They do not have a right to "act anyway they want". Obviously, if their speech is threatening, it is an act of concern. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Consider the case of people who hate the U.S., like you and the sniper. You talk against the U.S. He acts against the U.S. You are free. He is under arrest. Even you should be able to understand the difference.