Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nancy who wrote (9040)	10/23/2002 9:10:20 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

This should help to explain it stockcharts.com[r,a]dhcaynay[dd][pb50!b200!b30!b20][iub14][J7741154,Y]&listNum=1

To: Nancy who wrote (9040)	10/23/2002 9:20:25 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

I believe that he means to imply that the "negated" sell is wrong. (i.e. it is time to really sell, regardless of the "negation") Evidence shown by the comments in the referenced posts of March and August ("see the date")... and then the subsequent reality confused ? Yeah well so am I... and not by the post, but confounded by the entire market and the drunks in it.... seems to me they have been given the keys to the safe and so they are buying with [apparently] increasing risk for the market to fall... not to mention incredible abandon pushing p/e's to once again crazy levels (or on its way to ) but... wtfdik. by the way... Jorj... thanks for all the charts... edit: I see he has re-inforced the evidence by the graph... a picture is worth...