Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (63539)	10/24/2002 9:58:23 AM
From: E	Respond to of 82486

Oh, dear, X. You just say anything, it's amazing. You and CH use your training to promulgate untruths by means of, to borrow his phrase which applies as well to your tricks, "Word games." I think I'll post my reply in three parts, since it's sort of on three subjects. One: Did this happen, really?: after YOU told me you wouldn't stop emailing me until you were finished getting your point across No. This is the statement to which you are referring: There's a problem with in essence calling someone a liar and then saying you won't read their reply. I don't know if "won't read" means you don't see my PM or not, but in case, here the the answer to your inaccurate characterizations of me, though since you weren't specific about the "contradictions," I can't address the issue fully.

To: epicure who wrote (63539)	10/24/2002 9:59:12 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Two: There is a mental or ethical dead spot, or a very twisted one, reveal in your inability to comprehend what CH has done here, and demonstrated himself to be, in spite of many attempts, a number of them by me, both publicly an in PM, to help him out of his situation. At least I hope it's an inability to comprehend. Otherwise, it's a worse thing. You are now defending him explicitly instead of just by playing kissy-face. X, CH is not the victim. Your identification with him, and blindness (I hope) to his evil behavior, is a serious thing (but fortunately not my life-problem.) Do you know how bizarre it is that you think 3 emails (seen by no one else) from a former (female) friend with whom you'd emailed before is "coming after [you] in 3D" and therefore deserves a threat of bad 3D consequences designed to imply a lawsuit -- *But!....* when it's not you, but a different female, who is the victim over many weeks of many dozens of persecutory, slanderous, salacious, threatening, sadistic public posts from a male on SI and on another public site where he posted even on her own thread... Well, you identify with him and ally with him against his victim(s)! That isn't from logic, it's from psyche. You're a tender plant where your own emotions are concerned. But those of other females, when the gross abuser is a male?

To: epicure who wrote (63539)	10/24/2002 9:59:55 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Three: Historical Reminder: I stopped posting to or about you. You kept up the "needling," to borrow kholt's word for your behavior, because you enjoyed it. So I don't have much sympathy for you when you complain about being needled. Second Historical Reminder: You brought all this 3D bs up, yesterday, not I. It's pitiful that you feel yourself so disgraced that you have to bring up a measeley episode of three emails that came after you tossed a stink bomb in PM and ran off. I've apologized now, what, five times? for what was nothing more than pissed off defiance containing no threats whatever, unlike CH's threats to Poet which you take so casually. For which emails you threatened to sue me. Or so you intended us to think. Yeah, yeah, you didn't say it explicitly. You just said you'd take 3D steps we wouldn't like, giving two "Notices," very legalistic in style. Clever, you and CH, with your presumably lawschool-learned "word play."