SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Microsoft Corp. - Moderated (MSFT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: alydar who wrote (697)10/24/2002 6:08:05 PM
From: David Howe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19790
 
They will need to determine what the damages would be. Given the fact that practically ZERO businesses have found a way to make money on the internet (ie. Explorer is given away), it will be difficult to award damages for lost profits. You can't award damages for lost market cap because as we all know, the market cap for internet stocks was inappropriate to begin with.

The Netscape situation as an example, what are the damages? They still exist and they are still giving away browsers. Are they harmed because less people will use their free browser? Perhaps, but what's the quantity of the harm? Maybe a couple hundred million just for kicks. Find a jury that thinks this is even worth pursuing, and you might have a chance of getting a billion.

Heck, I don't even know why a billion $ damage award would even effect MSFT's market cap.



To: alydar who wrote (697)10/25/2002 3:12:46 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19790
 
So this judge is wading through the hundreds of Findings of Fact in Jackson's ruling to find those that specifically support the convictions that the Appeals Court upheld, and is considering somehow making that list easily usable to jurors in other suits against MSFT. Wouldn't it be ironic if justice prevailed in this case despite MSFT's closed-door deal with Dubya's "Justice" Department?

Dave