SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (63780)10/24/2002 9:50:17 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Yep, if you write a message to someone, FIRST NOTICE. SECOND NOTICE, worded so that it sounds as though it's a threat to sue (and you're a lawyer), (and I believe I could find your post where you admitted it was worded ambiguously so that interpretation was there)...

then you've threatened to sue them.

If you'd meant "I will... tell your mother," or "I will block you from my Inbox," or "I will ask your isp not to forward mail from you," you would have simply said that that was the threat.

But if you CHOOSE to word the threat to do something we really won't like, something serious, that will hurt us, and two bright people understand that the lawyer has just threatened to sue...

your claim that in your head you were really planning a lesser course of action is meaningless.

Since you meant us to believe you it was a threat to sue, then you threatened to sue us, X. Over three lousy emails. Two, really, after the first, which elicited the warning NOTICEs.