Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Calladine who wrote (13802)	10/25/2002 8:12:24 AM
From: Bill Fischofer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

So does he ever speak in any other way? If so what distinguishes the various modes of speaking? If there is nothing but God then clearly everything and everyone is a direct manifestation of God. At one level this is wondrous and at another it is the most ordinary thing of all. I have no problem saying that Adi Da is God, but then I have no problem with saying that you or I or Frederick or Solon or anyone and everything else is God either because if I really believe that "We are All One" then such an observation flows naturally from this perception. If someone tells you that He can show you how to find God, implicit in that statement is the supposition that there is something other than God which will do the "finding". Yet I tell you this: If there is nothing but God then the Ego you seem to love to decry is as much God as anything else, no less and no more. The "problem" is not in this observation but rather in the conclusions one chooses to draw from that observation. By such conclusions we reveal what we conceive God to be and the limits we try to place on God in our effort to conceive Him. By this means we create our experience of God.