SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (10608)10/25/2002 2:08:48 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Cigna Shares Tumble as Insurer Cuts Profit Forecasts (Update6)
By Keith Snider

Philadelphia, Oct. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Cigna Corp. shares tumbled as much as 45 percent, their biggest drop in at least two decades, after a lower profit forecast further eroded investor confidence in the health insurer.

Cigna lowered its 2003 forecast today, a day after cutting its estimate for this year and a week after saying third-quarter expenses in a reinsurance unit had reached $1 billion. Chief Executive Officer H. Edward Hanway also has been struggling with higher medical costs and disruptions in a computer system that was supposed to improve customer service and save Cigna money.

``We decided to give this one the boot,'' said Keith Gangl, who helps manage $3 billion for Lutheran Brotherhood Inc., which sold its Cigna shares during the third quarter. ``They have too many issues with the write-offs and systems integration. There are too many other good names out there.''

Shares of Cigna dropped $26.50 to $37.10 as of 1:28 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The stock was the fourth-biggest percentage loser on U.S. markets.

After U.S. markets closed yesterday, Cigna said third-quarter profit, excluding some expenses, was about $1.47 a share. That was lower than its previous forecast of $1.90 to $2.05. Full-year earnings will be $6.50 to $6.75 a share, less than its previous forecast of $7.85 to $8.15, Cigna said.

The company was expected to earn $1.99 in the third quarter and $7.96 for the year, the average estimates of analysts polled by Thomson First Call.

Monday Call

Cigna said today that 2003 profit will be about $6.25 to $6.50 a share and scheduled a conference call on Monday. Analysts expected the company to earn $8.84 a share next year.

At least three Wall Street analysts cut their ratings on the stock earlier today.

The yield of Cigna's 6 3/8 percent coupon notes maturing in 2001 rose to as much as 265 basis points more than benchmark U.S. Treasuries from 203 basis points yesterday, traders said. Corporate bond yields rise compared with government debt when investors perceive more risk to the securities.

The Philadelphia-based company didn't provide a net income or loss figure. Cigna said it would reorganize operations to manage medical expenses better and try to find more savings, though it didn't provide details. That reorganization will result in fourth- quarter costs, the company said.

Cigna is scheduled to report third-quarter results Nov. 1.

Cigna also said it will increase its minimum pension liability in the fourth quarter because the stock-market decline has hurt its pension plans. The change would wipe out $600 million to $700 million in shareholder equity, based on recent market conditions, the company said.

Computer Trouble

Cigna blamed the lower forecast on higher claims in some health-insurance accounts and costs related to the new computer system, which helps the company price premiums, track costs and process claims. Rival Oxford Health Plans Inc. had losses in 1997 and 1998 after computer problems left it unable to estimate medical claims accurately.

The insurer already told investors to expect $1 billion in additional third-quarter costs in a reinsurance unit that has been inactive for two years. Cigna boosted reserves by $720 million in September to cover losses in guaranteed investment contracts in the unit since the stock market dropped. It also had costs of $315 million from a dispute over a workers' compensation pool and London reinsurance operations.

Debt Ratings

Cigna's debt ratings were cut Oct. 1 by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services and may be reduced further, S&P said. Moody's Investors Service said it may lower ratings on $1.6 billion in Cigna debt.

``I'm surprised to see the lower outlook confined to health care,'' said Joshua Raskin, a Lehman Brothers Inc. analyst who has an ``underweight'' rating on Cigna and doesn't own the shares. ``It doesn't appear that this will be the last refinement.''

Cigna led the Morgan Stanley Health Care Payer Index down 2.5 percent. Biggest U.S. health insurer UnitedHealth Group Inc. fell $1.28 to $97, No. 2 Aetna Inc. fell 5 cents to $40.95, and Oxford Health Plans Inc. fell $1.11 to $41.27 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading.

Gangl said his fund sold Cigna to concentrate on UnitedHealth and Blue Cross & Blue Shield insurers Anthem Inc. and WellPoint Health Networks Inc., which have outperformed the index this year.

Cigna's setbacks probably won't spread to others in the health-insurance industry, said Norman Fidel, who manages almost $3 billion for Alliance Capital Management.

``Cigna's problems are basically due to their information- systems transformation, which left them not knowing their costs and with customer-service problems,'' Fidel said. ``It doesn't have implications for the rest of the industry.''



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (10608)10/25/2002 2:22:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Citigroup Plans to Fire 1,200 Bankers, People Say (Update1)
By George Stein

New York, Oct. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc. plans to fire more than 1,200 employees in its investment and corporate banking units to help counter a revenue slump from merger advice, stock sales and securities trading, company executives said.

For the past month, top managers at Citigroup's Salomon Smith Barney division have been adding names to their lists of people to be fired on the orders of Salomon Chairman Charles Prince, they said. Citigroup employs close to 60,000 people in its corporate and investment bank businesses, an executive said.

``They are cutting their costs in a way that they will improve their margins when volumes pick up,'' said Marshall Front, who manages $1.8 billion at Front Barnett Associates LLC, which owns about $50 million in Citigroup shares. ``As an investor, I'm pleased.''

Retrenchment at the world's largest financial services institution comes after it already cut at least 3,600 positions in the corporate and investment banking division this year through Sept. 30 and another 2,000 last year, according to a company filing and a company executive. Wall Street firms have cut 61,000 jobs since employment in the industry peaked a year and a half ago, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

``We continue to look at areas that don't have a lot of activity and see whether it makes sense to manage down the staff,'' Citigroup Chief Financial Officer Todd Thomson told analysts on Oct. 15. ``We hadn't made any big announcements recently about that but continue to see smaller, if you will, reductions in parts of the business.''

Mergers, Corporate Finance

The cuts will include more than 200 investment bankers who are to be fired over the next few weeks, according to the New York Times, which reported the planned job cuts earlier today. About 10 percent to 15 percent of specialists in mergers and corporate finance will be affected, the newspaper said.

Cuts in fixed-income groups were announced on Monday, executives said. Many firing notices are likely to be sent next Tuesday, they said.

``We continue a process of targeted reductions throughout the organization that reflects the market realities and an ongoing review of our business,'' Salomon Smith Barney spokeswoman Arda Nazerian said.

Third-quarter profit in Citigroup's corporate and investment banking division fell 7 percent to $1.2 billion from the year-ago quarter. It's down 20 percent from the third quarter of 2000.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Chairman William Harrison said Oct. 16 that the second largest U.S. bank would cut more than 2,000 investment-banking jobs. Credit Suisse Group said it's eliminating 6,550 jobs at its Credit Suisse First Boston investment bank and as many as 1,500 other positions in Switzerland.

Citigroup cut compensation and benefits at its corporate and investment banking unit 9 percent to $2.29 billion in the third quarter, compared with the year-ago period. It spent 42 cents of every dollar the units earned last quarter in compensation and benefits.

Citigroup shares, which have declined 26 percent this year, rose 7 cents to $34.74 at 11:24 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (10608)10/25/2002 7:46:36 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Winehouse's Alleged Scheme
tourolaw.edu

The complaint alleges that defendant Isaac Winehouse, doing business as Wall & Broad Equities, organized a "cartel" to purchase a percentage of the Nu-Tech convertible preferred in the names of nominees. He then allegedly arranged for a number of securities firms to become market makers in Nu-Tech common stock and proceeded to sell the common short, allegedly to drive the price of the common stock down.

The Dealings Among Nu-Tech, Winehouse and Plaintiff

Plaintiff Mordechai Gurary purchased 1,000 shares of Nu-Tech common on October 31, 1996 and another 5,500 shares on November 7, 1996 at $14.60 and $15.50 per share, respectively. In or about December 1996, the stock price began to decline. A concerned Gurary spoke to J. Marvin Feigenbaum, chairman of Nu-Tech. Feigenbaum told him that he had spoken to Winehouse and threatened that Nu-Tech would refuse to register the common stock into which the preferred was convertible unless Winehouse and his group stopped shorting the common. He predicted that this threat would convince Winehouse to stop shorting the stock because a refusal to register the common issued upon conversion would force Winehouse to cover his short position by purchasing Nu-Tech common in the open market, perhaps at higher prices. Gurary, evidently comforted, then purchased another 1,000 shares on December 24, 1996 at a price of $11.75 per share.

Gurary claims subsequently to have learned that Winehouse and his associates had continued to short the stock using nominee names, having arranged to "borrow" an unlimited number of shares for that purpose from market makers. On February 18, 1997, Gurary again spoke to Feigenbaum, who told him that he had met that day with Winehouse and others in another attempt to stop the short selling. Feigenbaum told Gurary that Nu-Tech had offered to repurchase the group's preferred shares at cost plus ten percent and to allow it to keep its existing profits from the short sales if the group would stop its activities but that Winehouse had refused. Feigenbaum, however, told Gurary that Nu-Tech would not give in to Winehouse and would refuse to register the short sellers' shares. Later that day, Gurary bought another 8,350 shares of Nu-Tech common at a price of $11.57.

On March 12, 1997, Feigenbaum and another Nu-Tech board member met again with Winehouse and asked that Winehouse and his group accept registration of the common stock into which their preferred was convertible over a period of twelve months rather than insisting that it be registered immediately. Winehouse again refused and said that he would continue to sell short.

Nu-Tech common stock dropped approximately $6 per share over the next two days. On March 14, 1997, the company issued a press release which stated that the price decline could be attributed to "possible sales by shareholders." No mention was made of the discussions between Nu-Tech and Winehouse, allegedly to avoid disrupting Nu-Tech's efforts to acquire Physicians Clinical Laboratory, Inc. ("PCL") out of bankruptcy.

A few days later, Gurary was approached through an intermediary and spoke with Winehouse, who allegedly admitted to him that he deliberately had shorted the stock to drive the price down, said that he intended to continue, and advised Gurary to sell his shares because the price would drop to "a dollar."



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (10608)10/26/2002 10:15:18 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
SEARCH EDGARS: Maslo Fund Ltd

Dec 22 1995 86.58 CONESTOGA ENTERPRISES INC
S-4  (696 KB)
Business Combination Transaction Registration Statement
Mar 28 2000 85.1 HOT PRODUCTS INC COM
SB-2  (288 KB)
Registration Statement for Small Business Issuers
Nov 20 1996 81.69 SC&T INTERNATIONAL INC
424B1  (219 KB)
Omitted Information From Original Registration Statement
Nov 08 1996 81.69 SC&T INTERNATIONAL INC
SB-2/A  (414 KB)
Amended Registration Statement for Small Business Issuers
Apr 19 1996 81.69 CONESTOGA ENTERPRISES INC
424B3  (678 KB)
Prospectus Changes or Additions
Jun 22 1998 79.67 SHOPPING COM
10QSB  (802 KB)
Quarterly Report
Jan 03 1997 79.67 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
S-3/A  (270 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Aug 02 1995 79.67 C TEC CORP
DEF 14A  (395 KB)
Proxy Statement
Jul 14 1995 79.67 C TEC CORP
PRER14A  (421 KB)
Preliminary Proxy Soliciting Materials
Jun 08 1995 79.67 C TEC CORP
PRER14A  (452 KB)
Preliminary Proxy Soliciting Materials
Aug 31 2000 77.42 EAGLE CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL LTD
SB-2  (402 KB)
Registration Statement for Small Business Issuers
Aug 31 2000 77.42 EAGLE CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL LTD
SB-2  (402 KB)
Registration Statement for Small Business Issuers
Jan 25 2000 77.42 ELECTRIC CITY CORP
10QSB  (51 KB)
Quarterly Report
Apr 15 1999 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
10KSB  (79 KB)
Annual Report
Nov 27 1998 77.42 SHOPPING COM
S-1/A  (606 KB)
Amended Initial Registration Statement
Oct 13 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
8-K  (166 KB)
Report of Unscheduled Material Events
Oct 08 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
S-3/A  (167 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Aug 18 1998 77.42 SHOPPING COM
S-1  (465 KB)
Initial Registration Statement
Aug 04 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
8-K  (149 KB)
Report of Unscheduled Material Events
Jul 30 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
S-3/A  (147 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Jun 26 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
8-K  (156 KB)
Report of Unscheduled Material Events
Jun 11 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
S-3  (157 KB)
Registration Statement
Apr 15 1998 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
10KSB  (111 KB)
Annual Report
Mar 25 1998 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
8-K  (12 KB)
Report of Unscheduled Material Events
Jan 12 1998 77.42 SEMICONDUCTOR LASER INTERNATIONAL CORP
S-3/A  (118 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Jan 06 1998 77.42 SEMICONDUCTOR LASER INTERNATIONAL CORP
S-3/A  (128 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Dec 18 1997 77.42 SEMICONDUCTOR LASER INTERNATIONAL CORP
S-3/A  (182 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Nov 24 1997 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
10QSB/A  (48 KB)
Amended Quarterly Report
Nov 10 1997 77.42 SEMICONDUCTOR LASER INTERNATIONAL CORP
S-3  (180 KB)
Registration Statement
Jul 21 1997 77.42 NU TECH BIO MED INC
S-3/A  (435 KB)
Amended Registration Statement
Jul 01 1997 77.42 NU TECH BIO MED INC
S-3  (429 KB)
Registration Statement
May 09 1997 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
10KSB  (140 KB)
Annual Report
Jan 23 1997 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
DEF 14C  (33 KB)

Jan 08 1997 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
PRER14C  (32 KB)
Preliminary Information Statement
Dec 23 1996 77.42 CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT INC
PRER14C  (31 KB)
Preliminary Information Statement
Dec 16 1996 77.42 NU TECH BIO MED INC
S-3  (768 KB)
Registration Statement
Dec 02 1996 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
S-3  (117 KB)
Registration Statement
Dec 02 1996 77.42 SYQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC
8-K  (119 KB)
Report of Unscheduled Material Events
Sep 27 1996 77.42 SC&T INTERNATIONAL INC
SB-2  (248 KB)
Registration Statement for Small Business Issuers
Displaying Results 21 - 39  



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (10608)10/26/2002 10:19:36 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
MASIO FUND WAS INVOLVED IN S C & T->THE MOB ON WALL STREET--PART 1
A three-month investigation reveals that organized crime has made shocking inroads into the small-cap stock market
In the world of multimedia components, Phoenix-based SC&T International Inc. has carved out a small but significant niche. SC&T's products have won raves in the trade press, but working capital has not always been easy to come by. So in December, 1995, the company brought in Sovereign Equity Management Corp., a Boca Raton (Fla.) brokerage, to manage an initial public offering. ''We thought they were a solid second- or third-tier investment bank,'' says SC&T Chief Executive James L. Copeland.

But there was much about Sovereign that was known to only a very few. There were, for example, the early investors, introduced by Sovereign, who had provided inventory financing for SC&T. Most shared the same post office box in the Bahamas. ''I had absolutely no idea of who those people were,'' says Copeland. He asked Sovereign. ''I was told, 'Who gives a s---. It's clean money.''' The early investors cashed out, at the offering price of $5, some 1.575 million shares that they acquired at about $1.33 a share--a gain of some $5.8 million.

By mid-June, SC&T was trading at $8 or better. But for SC&T shareholders who did not sell by then, the stock was an unmitigated disaster. Sovereign, which had handled over 60% of SC&T's trades early in the year, sharply reduced its support of the stock. Without the backing of Sovereign and its 75-odd brokers, SC&T's shares plummeted--to $2 in July, $1 in September, and lately, pennies. The company's capital-raising ability is in tatters. Laments Copeland: ''We're in the crapper.''

A routine case of a hot stock that went frigid. Or was it? Copeland didn't know it, but there was a man who kept a very close eye on SC&T and is alleged by Wall Street sources to have profited handsomely in the IPO--allegedly by being one of the lucky few who sold shares through a Bahamian shell company. His name is Philip Abramo, and he has been identified in court documents as a ranking member, or capo, in the New Jersey-based DeCavalcante organized crime family.

James Copeland didn't know it. Nobody at SC&T could have dreamed it. But the almost unimaginable had come true: Copeland had put his company in the hands of the Mob.

Today, the stock market is confronting a vexing problem that, so far, the industry and regulators have seemed reluctant to face--or even acknowledge. Call it what you will: organized crime, the Mafia, wiseguys. They are the stuff of tabloids and gangster movies. To most investors, they would seem to have as much to do with Wall Street as the other side of the moon.

But in the canyons of lower Manhattan, one can find members of organized crime, their friends and associates. How large a presence? No one--least of all regulators and law enforcement--seems to know. The Street's ranking reputed underworld chieftain, Abramo, is described by sources familiar with his activities as controlling at least four brokerages through front men and exerting influence upon still more firms. Until recently, Abramo had an office in the heart of the financial district, around the corner from the regional office of an organization that might just as well be on Venus as far as the Mob is concerned--the National Association of Securities

Dealers, the self-regulatory organization that oversees the small-stock business.

A three-month investigation by BUSINESS WEEK reveals that substantial elements of the small-cap market have been turned into a veritable Mob franchise, under the very noses of regulators and law enforcement. And that is a daunting prospect for every investor who buys small-cap stocks and every small company whose stock trades on the NASDAQ market and over the counter. For the Mob makes money in various ways, ranging from exploiting IPOs to extortion to getting a ''piece of the action'' from traders and brokerage firms. But its chief means of livelihood is ripping off investors by the time-tested method of driving share prices upward--and dumping them on the public through aggressive cold-calling.

In its inquiry, BUSINESS WEEK reviewed a mountain of documentation and interviewed traders, brokerage executives, investors, regulators, law-enforcement officials, and prosecutors. It also interviewed present and former associates of the Wall Street Mob contingent. Virtually all spoke on condition of anonymity, with several Street sources fearing severe physical harm--even death--if their identities became known. One, a former broker at a Mob-run brokerage, says he discussed entering the federal Witness Protection Program after hearing that his life might be in danger. A short-seller in the Southwest, alarmed by threats, carries a gun.

Among BUSINESS WEEK's findings:
-- The Mob has established a network of stock promoters, securities dealers, and the all-important ''boiler rooms''--a crucial part of Mob manipulation schemes--that sell stocks nationwide through hard-sell cold-calling. The brokerages are located mainly in the New York area and in Florida, with the heart of their operations in the vicinity of lower Broad Street in downtown Manhattan.

-- Four organized crime families as well as elements of the Russian Mob directly own or control, through front men, perhaps two dozen brokerage firms that make markets in hundreds of stocks. Other securities dealers and traders are believed to pay extortion money or ''tribute'' to the Mob as just another cost of doing business on the Street.

-- Traders and brokers have been subjected in recent months to increasing levels of violent ''persuasion'' and punishment--threats and beatings. Among the firms that have been subject to Mob intimidation, sources say, is the premier market maker in NASDAQ stocks--Herzog, Heine, Geduld Inc.

-- Using offshore accounts in the Bahamas and elsewhere, the Mob has engineered lucrative schemes involving low-priced stock under Regulation S of the securities laws. Organized crime members profit from the runup in such stocks and also from short-selling the stocks on the way down. They also take advantage of the very wide spreads between the bid and ask prices of the stock issues controlled by their confederates.

-- The Mob's activities seem confined almost exclusively to stocks traded in the over-the-counter ''bulletin board'' and NASDAQ small-cap markets. By contrast, New York Stock Exchange and American Stock Exchange issues and firms apparently have been free of Mob exploitation.

-- Wall Street has become so lucrative for the Mob that it is allegedly a major source of income for high-level members of organized crime--few of whom have ever been publicly identified as having ties to the Street. Abramo, who may well be the most active reputed mobster on the Street, has remained completely out of the public eye--even staying active on the Street after his recent conviction for tax evasion.

-- Mob-related activities on the Street are the subject of inquiries by the FBI and the office of Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau, which is described by one source as having received numerous complaints concerning mobsters on the Street. (Officials at both agencies and the New York Police Dept. did not respond to repeated requests for comment.)

-- Overall, the response of regulators and law enforcement to Mob penetration of Wall Street has been mixed at best. Market sources say complaints of Mob coercion have often been ignored by law enforcement. Although an NASD spokesman says the agency would vigorously pursue reports of Mob infiltration, two top NASD officials told BUSINESS WEEK that they have no knowledge of Mob penetration of member firms. Asked to discuss such allegations, another high NASD official declined, saying: ''I'd rather you not tell me about it.''

-- The Hanover, Sterling & Co. penny-stock firm, which left 12,000 investors in the lurch when it went out of business in early 1995, is alleged by people close to the firm to have been under the control of members of the Genovese organized crime family. Sources say other Mob factions engaged in aggressive short-selling of stocks brought public by Hanover.

-- Federal investigators are said to be probing extortion attempts by Mob-linked short-sellers who had been associated with the now-defunct Stratton Oakmont penny-stock firm.

Mob manipulation has affected the markets in a wide range of stocks. Among those identified by BUSINESS WEEK are Affinity Entertainment, Celebrity Entertainment, Beachport Entertainment, Crystal Broadcasting, First Colonial Ventures, Global Spill Management, Hollywood Productions, Innovative Medical Services, International Nursing Services, Novatek International, Osicom Technologies, ReClaim, SC&T, Solv-Ex, and TJT. Officials of the companies deny any knowledge of Mob involvement in the trading of their stocks, and there is no evidence that company managements have been in league with stock manipulators. These stocks were allegedly run up by Mob-linked brokers, who sometimes used force or threats to curtail short-selling in the stocks. When support by allegedly Mob-linked brokerages ended, the stocks often suffered precipitous declines--sometimes abetted, traders say, by Mob-linked short-sellers. The stocks have generally fared poorly (table, page 99).

Not all of the stocks were recent IPOs, and they were often taken public by perfectly legitimate underwriters. International Nursing, for example, went public at $23 in 1994 and was trading at $8 in early 1996 before falling back to pennies. Short-sellers who attempted to sell the shares earlier this year were warned off--in one instance by a Mob member--market sources assert. International Nursing Chairman John Yeros denies knowledge of manipulation of the stock.

What this all adds up to is a shocking tale of criminal infiltration abetted by widespread fear and silence--and official inaction. While firms and brokerage executives who strive to keep far afield of the Mob often complain of NASD inaction, rarely do such people feel strongly enough to share their views with regulators or law enforcement. Instead, they engage in self-defense. One major brokerage, which often executes trades for small-cap market makers, keeps mammoth intelligence files--to steer clear of Mob-run brokers. A major accounting firm keeps an organized-crime expert on the payroll. His duties include preventing his firm from doing business with brokerages linked to organized crime and the Russian Mob.

In the pages that follow are the results of BUSINESS WEEK's investigation.

THE BOX
At about 3 o'clock in the afternoon of Sept. 25, 1996, three men appeared on the 28th floor of 120 Broadway, Manhattan. They walked into the offices of Sharpe Capital Inc., a dealer in over-the-counter stocks. They were burly. ''Like lumberjacks,'' said an eyewitness soon after. A gun was in the belt of one of the men.

The confidential police report of the incident (Complaint No. 10530, First Precinct) reads as follows:

''At that point they asked the victim what he was trading in. Then they slapped him in the head and stated again, 'What the f-- are you trading in.' Then he slapped the victim in the head again.''

A witness recalls one of the men saying: ''Don't f-- with our stock.'' The stock: Crystal Broadcasting Inc. After the men left, Sharpe stopped trading in Crystal Broadcasting.

To the New York Police Dept., the incident at Sharpe was about as serious as a scuffle over a parking space. A police source says that the assault, categorized as a low-grade misdemeanor at best, is considered closed and is not being investigated because the victim was not seriously hurt, no gun was displayed--even though one was observed--and the perpetrators were unknown. (However, one witness ruefully notes, police did nothing to ascertain their identity--such as examine a security-camera surveillance tape.) Sharpe's CEO, Lawrence Hoes, declined to discuss the matter.

But BUSINESS WEEK learned that the assault at Sharpe was not an isolated incident. Rather, it was part of a systematic pattern of intimidation. By eliminating competing market makers and allowing only cooperating brokers to bid on stocks, the result is a kind of rigged auction--with the prices where desired, and the spreads between bid and ask prices kept as wide as possible. In Street parlance, this process of rigging the market in a stock is known as ''boxing'' a stock. It is part of the lexicon of the Mob's dominion on Wall Street (page 99).

The box is the heart of most stock-manipulation schemes. In the case of Crystal, the trader at Sharpe was suspected of ''cracking the spread.'' According to market sources who were familiar with the trading in Crystal that day, Sharpe was blamed, in effect, for doing what a market maker is supposed to do--get the best possible price for its customers and keeping the spreads as narrow as possible. During the day, Crystal traded as low as 4, well below the 5 1/8 closing price of the day before, and the spreads narrowed as well, to a relatively reasonable 4 3/8 bid and 4 7/8 ask. Sharpe was blamed for that benign--to most people--market action.

In the weeks following the Sharpe incident, Crystal shares were trading at the kind of spreads that can only happen when the market is tightly controlled. If you buy it from a dealer, you pay the ask price, $3.50. But when you sell it, you get the bid--56.2 cents. (Crystal's president, Joseph Newman, said he had no knowledge of coercion of market makers in his stock.)

Sometimes the maneuvering involved in creating and exploiting the box can be as subtle as a bison in a china shop. One West Coast investor, who requested anonymity, says that brokers at a small New York firm, Monitor Investment Group, convinced him that two small-cap stocks--International Nursing Services and Beachport Entertainment--were about to be pushed upward. Says the investor: ''They said they had a handle on all this stock. They said they'd run it up and get me out of it in a week.''

So sometime around last New Year's Day, he bought warrants and a big block of the stock--100,000 shares of International Nursing and 85,000 of Beachport. When he tried to sell, he says, his brokers flatly refused. The shares, which had started heading southward almost from the moment he bought them, plummeted. They're now worth one-fifth of what he paid. Monitor Chairman William F. Palla denies the firm was involved in stock manipulation but concedes a broker may have promised a runup but not really meant it.

Sometimes, of course, thinly traded stocks can be run down by aggressive short sellers, and the Mob is alleged by Street sources to have profited from that as well. One target of investigators, sources say, is a coterie of brokers formerly associated with the defunct penny-stock brokerage of Stratton Oakmont. Sources familiar with the investigation say that authorities are exploring charges that some of these brokers, after Stratton's demise, may have extorted money from their former colleagues in the business--allegedly threatening to short-sell stocks underwritten by those firms. According to sources, the Stratton brokers allegedly shared their profits with a member of a New York crime family.

Among the trading being investigated, sources say, are stocks underwritten by a penny-stock firm called State Street Capital Markets. Stocks brought public by the New York-based firm--Fun Tyme Concepts, U.S. Bridge of N.Y., and Cable & Co. Worldwide--were pummeled in the market last August, and trading in the stocks is allegedly being probed. At the time, State Street maintained that its shares were victimized by concerted short-selling. State Street officials did not return phone calls, and Stratton officials could not be reached for comment.

''YOU'VE MADE A FRIEND''
First Colonial Ventures Ltd. is a minor venture-capital firm whose stock trades on the OTC bulletin board--so small that it is not required to file more than token disclosures with the Securities & Exchange Commission. But for market makers in small-cap stocks, First Colonial looms huge. It is an object lesson: When the Mob speaks, market makers obey.

The incidents took place early in October, one week after the assault at Sharpe. First came a beating. A trader at Naib Trading Corp. in Fort Lauderdale was summoned to the office of a man by the name of Roy Ageloff. The trader has told associates that Ageloff had beaten him once before with a nail-pierced baseball bat. This time, he said, Ageloff left the room. Then a 400-pound hoodlum knocked him down and kicked him while he was on the floor. The message: Stay away from First Colonial.

The trader at Naib was not the only one to suffer ''persuasion'' over First Colonial. Sources say that four other firms were approached with warnings to cease trading in the stock. To be sure, it was not a total success. There was one rebuff: A market maker in the little town of Hurst, Tex., Anthony Elgindy of Key West Securities Inc., says he ignored warnings that traders who did not comply would soon be ''facing the ceiling''--and has received numerous threatening phone calls since then. But at two other market makers, the intimidation worked. They ceased making a market in First Colonial.

The market makers dropping the stock were William V. Frankel & Co. in Jersey City, N.J., and the biggest name in NASDAQ stocks: Herzog, Heine, Geduld. Sources say traders at both firms quit trading the stock after receiving menacing visits at their offices. ''We decided we shouldn't get involved in a stock like that,'' says Herzog's head trader, Irwin Geduld. Was anyone at his firm threatened? ''We weren't,'' said Geduld. ''Someone else was.'' (A Frankel trader, who declined to give his name, says: ''We have no comment whatsoever about First Colonial Ventures.'') Even a brokerage that was not a market maker, D.L. Cromwell Investments Inc. in Boca Raton, received a visit from a thug, a source says. The visitor left after demanding, and being shown, proof that the firm was not a short-seller in the stock. Cromwell officials declined comment.

Sources say that traders who caved in to coercion later received expensive bottles of liquor with a note that read: ''You've made a friend.'' But the market makers who dropped First Colonial were making no new pals among investors. Since the incident, the ask price paid by the public for buying First Colonial stock has climbed--from a low of $1.13 on Oct. 2 to as high as $4.13 in recent trading. But the bid price that the public gets when selling the stock back to the Street has been far less buoyant. The bid promptly rose from a low of 87 cents on Oct. 2 to $1.50 and has stayed at about that level, even as the ask price has skyrocketed to almost three times that figure. (On Oct. 4, according to a letter sent to market makers obtained by BUSINESS WEEK, the NASD launched an inquiry into the dropping of First Colonial stock by market makers. The NASD declined comment on the investigation.)

Who was behind the wave of intimidation over First Colonial? NASDAQ trading figures point toward a New York-based firm called PCM Securities Ltd. PCM was the largest market maker in First Colonial in September, with 48% of the trades. By October, however, this rose to 75%. PCM completely dominated the market in First Colonial.

Although he is not listed in NASD records as a control person or even as an employee of PCM--or of any other brokerage--Street sources say that the power behind PCM is the 37-year-old Ageloff. He did not respond to numerous messages left at PCM's office in Boca Raton. An employee there said Ageloff nowadays spends most of his time there, punctuated by frequent visits to New York. Asked about Ageloff, Steven Edelson, PCM's principal, denied that Ageloff has any role in the firm and says he has met him only once. Edelson had no comment on its trading in First Colonial, and First Colonial President Murray Goldenberg said he was ''shocked'' to hear reports of intimidation of market makers.

(Continued on next screen)
By Gary Weiss