SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (54668)10/25/2002 1:52:36 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Terrorism is not going to go away, period. Neither will the hatred. The hatred is less about us than the culture that foments it.

I think Bush's advisors understand the "big picture" with perfect clarity. I think they grasp the risks. I think they realize that unintended consequences naturally fall in the wake of any course of action...including appeasement, disengagement, buy-offs, and signed treaties.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (54668)10/25/2002 2:16:01 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
...unfortunately, the NeoCon policy makers advising Dubya don't seem to understand 'the big picture' and all the potential UNINTENDED CONSEQUNCES of a 'pre-emptive strike' to engineer regime change in Iraq

I think they realize that they are proposing a risky and destabilizing course of action (incidently, just the opposite of the desires of the oil men, to whom stability is all-important). They believe that the kind of stability which brings us a 9/11 has become unaffordable for the US, and see that our so-called "moderate Arab allies" were every bit as responsible for it as our openly avowed radical Arab enemies.

The hatred of the Islamists, being irrational at its base, cannot be assuaged by rational policy adjustments; however, their contempt for the US -- thought just as important for recruitement -- can be changed into fear.