SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (57763)10/25/2002 3:32:00 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
COT??



To: marginmike who wrote (57763)10/25/2002 3:32:42 PM
From: Jack of All Trades  Respond to of 209892
 
NDX 10pts away from 1000 think it closes above it today?



To: marginmike who wrote (57763)10/25/2002 3:42:26 PM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Man, i don't know if I like you anymore (with this new e-wave stuff you throwin' at me/us) GG You raise some good points. The evidence is not totally conclusive for bears, but better than early in week I believe- and at same price levels (bearish divergence?). Volume, and that's a basic criterion you can't argue, has not been impressive on up.

Debating closing this one...I'm still pretty light here, i guess that's why I'm not sweating....of course, another trading rule I frequently need reminded of...is all money is important, and not sweating small positions is an easy way to lose them



To: marginmike who wrote (57763)10/25/2002 3:50:08 PM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
<Distribution> A more pointed answer to your question...

I reckon when/if big money was buying this....it would resemble a "3", impulsive etc....

Smart money has made money off of this from the bottom '(forcing shorts to cover)- but not necessarily big money...smart money sees all those gaps on the chart and worries...smart money would almost prefer a pullback to fill those...

This low volume, small bearish divergences while no price gain week.....intuitively, that tells me its the guys who made 20-30% in 2 weeks saying, "lets keep this up, distribute, and reup after a retrace"...same old, same old..

As a result, i could see it grind higher (more distribution to bagholders), but an explosion up from here (given stochastics, charts) seems unlikely, and is a modest bear bet I'm willing to make here. As you know, I am often a little bit early, but I can't use that as my moniker (already taken)

The points you mention, plus the election (a little) do bother me...but I find the above-listed points stronger..

Man, I am long-winded or what g,ng



To: marginmike who wrote (57763)10/25/2002 4:05:44 PM
From: Shack  Respond to of 209892
 
Looking at equity p/c on my Qcharts (all exchanges) is a fairly low .59 but it is just an isolated reading of course.

What matters more to me is the 10 day EMA and that is now siting at .59 as well which is well in the lower half of its multi-year range which as oscillated between .45 and .80 since Jan 2001. I look for 10-day EMA's of .50 before I am willing to look at an 'IT' top. The last times I got readings that low were.

late Jan 2001
late May 2001
late July 2001
late November 2001
Aug, 22 2002

Each were met with a large sell-off and it makes me very skeptical that we will exceed that Aug 22 top.