SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (8493)10/26/2002 1:30:16 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Friday, October 25, 2002 (Puplava standin Friday wrap)

Flight to Safety 2002
If you are still holding financial, manufacturing and technology stocks or mutual funds, I would like to direct your attention to the floor where white lights lead to red lights and red lights mark the location of the emergency exit doors. In the flight to safety during this bear market we have seen a couple of different phases.

First we saw mass exodus from the high-flying technology stocks in the Nasdaq to the Blue Chips in the Dow. In the last six months we have seen more money come out of the stock market and race to the security of U.S. Treasury debt paper of all maturities. Now is still a good time to get out of the stock market, especially if you can catch a trading high in your stocks. When we take a hard look at the upside potential versus the downside risk over the next few quarters, there is clearly more in favor of the downside risk. On the chart above, I combined the two S&P 500 charts from last week and included the neckline of the five-year head and shoulders chart formation. Even if the market can regroup to push through the 900 barrier, I don’t see it breaking through the neckline or the long-term bear market channel.

Fundamentally Poor Valuations
From a fundamental perspective, the price to earnings ratio is the most basic of measures. A look at history shows the average P/E to be 14. It is simply the market capitalization divided by earnings, or the price per share divided by earnings per share. The reciprocal of 14 (1/14) is roughly 7%, which is also the rule of thumb for the historical yield on the 30-year Treasury Bond. If you use rough numbers and say the Treasury yield is 5%, then the compliment in terms of P/E would be 20. Just yesterday, Standard & Poors released “core earnings” for the S&P 500 Index.

For the second quarter the “reported” earnings were $26.74 while the “core earnings” just released was $18.48 after adjustments from pension and stock option accounting. To use today’s closing price of 898 with the core earnings of $18.48, the true P/E is 48.6. If you use the optimistic P/E of 20 based on a 5% yield and 18.48 for earnings, the market value of the S&P 500 would be 370. That’s a whopping decline of 59% from what we see today! Unless there is a dramatic rebound in earnings, we have a long way to go in this bear market. If you have family and friends that are still invested for the long term in equity mutual funds you should strongly urge them to get out!

In Tuesday’s Market WrapUp this week, Jim Puplava wrote a nice piece on primary and secondary market trends. To sum it up, the trend is your friend. It’s not a good idea to invest against the primary market trend unless you really like to trade and you’re good at market timing.

For most of this week the stock market has pretty much gone sideways. The Dow rose 121.59 points to 8443.99 for a gain of 1.5%. The Nasdaq added 43.26 to close at 1331.12 for a 3.4% increase and the S&P 500 tacked on 13.27 for a close of 897.65, a gain of 1.5%. The bear market rally is still intact, but appears to be losing its momentum.

Market internals are looking poor even though stock prices have risen. Unlike the late July rally this past summer NYSE volume was much lower in this turn around. Market breadth has also been weak. The best advancing day only produced a 3.5:1 margin. Money flow has also been poor. As to the assumption that the individual investor is back, that may only apply to day traders. According to Trim Tabs all equity funds had outflows this week of $1.8 billion. This follows outflows of $9.8 billion the previous week. Money still continues to flow into bond funds with $1.8 billion going into bond funds, matching the outflows out of stocks. Day traders may be playing this market but from the looks of things, private investors continue to exit the markets. In the last two weeks alone almost $12 billion has flown out of equity funds. Mutual fund cash positions have fallen to a record low of 4.2%. Unless Wall Street can sucker individual investors, it is unlikely this rally will have any legs. Like the previous rally in July-August the bulk of the rally occurred in just a few days. The markets did very little outside those one-day wonders.

The only compelling reason to buy stocks is to trade them at the risk of being caught long when the markets take their next big tumble. At the risk of sounding repetitious, there is nothing on the economic front, the earnings side, or from a valuation viewpoint that would make the case for owning stocks. The only reason now being given to win stocks is because they have fallen 40%. What is forgotten here is that when bull market manias correct themselves stock prices can fall much further. During the Great Depression stocks lost 90% of their value. Looking at earnings prospects, stocks are still more overvalued than they were in 1929 and in 1973-74 during the last bear markets. If Wall Street wants investors to go back into stocks they are going to have to do a much better job than this.

As a side note, it is interesting to see financial and news magazines do stories on the stock market urging investors to jump in and buy. The latest BusinessWeek featured a story by author of “Stocks for the Long Run” Jeremy Segal urging investors to jump back in. The reason? Stock prices have fallen 40%. Magazines and news sources doing stories saying it is now safe to buy stocks should be taken as a contrary indicator, meaning investors should do just the opposite.

Tech Tidbits
I use the S&P 500 Index as a proxy for the stock market for a few reasons. I don’t use the Dow because it is only 30 stocks and with a large movement in a few of the higher priced issues, the index can have distortions that tend to be misleading. I also don’t use the NASDAQ because it is driven by press releases, lacks fundamental logic and seems to be the arena for speculators. To make investment decisions we need to filter out the noise and heighten the degree of predictability in order to increase our probability of success.

I expect the bear market forces to reassert themselves soon because the economic news is still lousy. I will increase my short exposure to the market as soon as I have confirmation that the bear market rally has ended.



One of the technical indicators that I use is known as the Stochastic Oscillator. It is one of many momentum indicators that use statistical price ratios to determine when a stock or index is overbought or oversold. On the charts above, the monthly stochastic indicates an oversold condition, the weekly stochastic is neutral but heading up, and the daily stochastic is indicating a short-term, overbought condition. I expect the weekly to turn down, and when the daily and weekly are both pointed south, I will pound my short position to profit from the market decline. Also note that the monthly stochastic can stay down for a long period of time just as it remained high for a great portion of the bull market.

Some of the other technical indicators that are very useful include straight moving averages, MACD (moving average convergence/divergence) and up/down volume trends. If you would like more detail on the Stochastic Oscillator, or wish to learn more about technical analysis, go to Stockcharts.com and click on the tab “chart school,” then “indicator analysis.” They have a wealth of information.

Treasuries Debt Update
Earlier this week we saw a continuation of last week’s decline in U.S. Treasuries. As the week progressed and equities began to sell off, some of the money came back to the bond market. One very important thing to note is that the bonds with longer maturities sold off more than the shorter maturities, causing the yield spread to widen (difference between short-term and long-term interest rates). A widening of the yield spread is usually interpreted as a warning against future inflation and indicates a loose monetary policy by the Fed. For the gold bugs out there, a widening spread can be construed as “gold-friendly.”

If you go back to the second half of 2000 you will find exactly the opposite situation. The yield curve wasn’t just flat, but was actually inverted. The Fed was raising rates at the time and short-term interest rates were higher than long-term rates. That’s when the door was slammed shut on the bull market in stocks. Since then, the Fed has been backpedaling with unprecedented rate cuts. Earlier this year the yield spread topped out just over 4%, and now stands at 3.5% and is heading up again.

In light of the widening yield spread, I thought it was interesting to see the market’s reaction when the Federal Reserve released its “Beige Book” on Wednesday. The Fed basically said that manufacturing has slowed, retail sales were weak across the country, labor markets are still soft and commercial loans are weak with rising delinquencies. Today durable goods orders were released for September and showed a decline of 5.9%. That was the largest decline in ten months. The bright spot still remains in the housing sector. Sales were higher for both new and resale homes. Thirty-year fixed mortgage rates have risen from 5.7% to 6.3%, but still remain at 30-year lows.

It’s fascinating that people continue to borrow more money as personal bankruptcies continue at record levels. Back in the early nineties, bankruptcies in the U.S. were below 400,000 annually, while today they are roughly 1.5 million per year.

With the weak economic news from the Fed on Wednesday, the stock markets rallied. The speculation on the trading floor was that because of the weak economic data, the Fed might cut interest rates. I don’t believe they will. Lowering the Fed Funds Rate would further expand the yield spread and could pose a threat to the strength of the dollar. With the rate at 1.75% there isn’t much room to go lower before we hit zero like Japan. The Fed would be pushing on the proverbial string. I expect that they will save the last cut or two in the event of a financial emergency.

Next week the Treasury is going to auction a hefty $44 billion in five and ten-year notes. That should help to put a lid on bond prices by adding supply which will keep us leaning in the direction of higher long-term interest rates. It will be interesting to see when the Treasury will reinstate the issuance of new 30-year T-bonds. According to Treasury Secretary O’Neill, the issue of 30-year bonds was stopped because of budget surpluses. I have a hunch they were eliminated to decrease the supply relative to demand, which would force prices higher and ultimately reduce long-term interest rates. What a great way to re-liquefy the system and increase borrowing. Our monetary system needs inflation to stay alive. A debt based monetary system gets really ugly when confronted with deflation. They have to create new money as fast as it’s being destroyed in the markets.

Smart Money Moving to 'Things'
Going back to my original thought of “Flight to Safety 2002”, we have gone from dot-coms to blue chips to treasuries—so where do we go from here? We’ve already seen the corporate bond bubble pop and now we are seeing signs of strain in the treasury debt bubble. As people continue to lose confidence in paper assets, they will move to tangible assets. People will want to own “things” of intrinsic value, and not just paper that represents someone else’s obligation to pay. We are moving toward stagflation where we will see continued deflation (call that destruction) of paper assets along with increasing prices on real goods and commodities. Another way to look at it would be, things that involve debt will come down (home prices, care sales, capital expenditures by business, credit card spending, etc.) and things that we pay for with cash (food, gasoline, tuition, electricity, insurance, taxes, etc.) will go up in price.

I believe that in the final phase of the Flight to Safety we will see a great portion of liquid assets fighting for capital preservation. They will start moving into tangible assets such as gold, silver, collectibles, commodities, and the like. Next week, we will take a closer look at precious metals and mining companies as a potential safe haven to preserve and increase our assets.

Overseas Markets
European stocks fell for the first week in three, as concerns about bad loans, slowing profit growth and lawsuits pushed companies such as HVB Group, ABB Ltd. and Bayer AG lower. The Dow Jones Stoxx 50 Index has dropped 2.3% this week, led by Bayer's 15% slump. The index lost 0.5 to 2547.01, after earlier dropping as much as 1.7%. Five of the eight major European markets were down during today's trading.

Japanese stocks rose on optimism the government will water down a bank bailout plan that some investors said may trigger a financial crisis. Lenders such as Mizuho Holdings Inc. led the advance. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average rose 1.3% to 8726.29. Elsewhere in the region, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index had its biggest slide in two weeks. China Mobile (H.K.) Ltd. and China Unicom Ltd. fell after Goldman, Sachs Group Inc. advised investors to sell China's top two mobile-phone companies.

Copyright © Michael Hartman
mhartman@puplava.com
October 25, 2002



To: stockman_scott who wrote (8493)10/26/2002 1:43:35 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 89467
 
PENSION PLAN POISON, by Eric J. Fry

Wouldn't it be nice if you were able to spend the amount of money you HOPE to make in the stock market, rather than the amount you actually make? Well, almost all of America's largest corporations get to do something very similar. Every year, they include in their 'earnings' the investment gains they HOPE their defined-benefit pension plans will earn.

Sometimes, the pension plans perform about as well as expected, especially over a three- to five-year time- frame. But - and here's where it gets interesting - sometimes they don't even come close to making their anticipated return. Instead, like a first date that features far more bad jokes than romantic glances, reality falls well short of expectations.

For example, during the fiscal year ending October 31, 2001, Deere & Co., the tractor company, expected its pension plan and post-retirement benefit plans to produce investment gains of $657 million. In actuality, however, these plans had losses of $1,419 billion. That's a difference of more than $2 billion! These latest losses bring Deere's underfunded pension liability to more than $3 billion. "At some point," observes Apogee Research, "Deere will have to deposit actual cash into its underfunded pension plan to make up the $3 billion shortfall. And yes, that's real money to Deere...$3 billion represents more than five years' worth of average net income!"

Investors should be aware that Deere is not the exception. "Last week investors were rudely awakened to the troubles that underfunded pension plans could pose for corporate America," writes Jacqueline Doherty of Barron's. "With the stock market down and pension-fund assets shrinking, companies ranging from Continental Airlines to Avon Products to the New York Times indicated they had made, or planned to make, fresh contributions to bolster the value of their pension plans...General Motors reported that assets in its U.S. pension plan had dropped by 10% this year, which means the company's after-tax pension expense could rise by about $1 billion, or $1.80 a share, in 2003." Standard & Poor's promptly downgraded GM's credit rating. "The primary reason for the downgrade is that poor pension investment portfolio returns have contributed to a huge increase in GM's already-large unfunded pension liability," an S&P analyst explained.

During the great bull market of the 1990s, outsized investment returns created a kind of "cookie jar" full of excess earnings. One way or another, America's creative CFOs made sure these excesses found their way onto the income statement, helping to flatter the reported earnings results. But the devastating bear market of the last few years has brought this practice to a screeching halt. Most of the corporate pension plans that once enjoyed a plump surplus now find themselves woefully underfunded. Despite this uncomfortable state of affairs, most companies are still in denial. They continue to project robust investment returns for their pension plans.

"Recently," Contrary Investor observes, "plan sponsor/investment industry magazine 'Pension and Investments' studied the assumed rates of forward investment return for the 100 largest corporate-defined benefit plans in this country...Although the study only provides data through 2001, here are some of the highlights worth noting: the average expected rate of return among the 100 count sample was 9.3% [and] 88% of the plans had a return assumption of 9% or greater...Yet, 95 of the 100 companies that made up the group experienced negative 2001 plan returns."

Eventually, however, companies will have no choice but to face the music and kick cash into their pension plans. That painful moment of truth has already arrived for a few companies...and that moment is close to arriving for a few hundred more.

Barron's Doherty explains: "According to David Zion, an accounting analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston, 360 companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index have defined pension-benefit plans. Of these, 240 had underfunded plans at the end of 2001, the highest level in ten years. With stocks and interest rates both in retreat - a poisonous combination that spells lower returns on fund assets and increased pension liabilities - Zion believes the number of companies with underfunded plans could balloon to 325 in 2003."

For many American corporations, the painful consequences will be twofold: the excess earnings produced by large investment gains in their pension plans will be gone, so CFOs will no longer be able to take a portion of their stock market bounty and book it as reported profit. As pension plan surpluses turn into deficits, many companies will have to contribute cold, hard cash to make up the shortfalls.

Neither of these facts will enhance the investment appeal of a stock like Deere. [It's no accident that Deere is one of Apogee Research's most recent short-sale recommendations.]

"If a pension plan remains underfunded," Doherty explains, "a company over time might need to direct its cash flow to pay its pension obligations before investing in its business, paying down debt, repurchasing shares or making other strategic moves that would benefit investors. The upshot: companies could end up working for their retirees instead of their shareholders."

"Zion estimates that S&P 500 companies with defined benefit plans will have to make $29 billion in cash contributions to their underfunded plans in 2003, up from $15 billion in 2001."

Longer term, the accumulated pension liabilities are even more daunting. Trevor Harris, head of Morgan Stanley's valuation and accounting research group, tells Doherty: "I think it's a huge issue unless the markets rebound. We have over $300 billion of pension-fund deficits in 2002 for S&P 500 companies. That's $300 billion of cash these companies have to come up with over the next few years, and $300 billion that comes out of corporate cash flow."

Incredibly, through the magic of GAAP accounting, these towering liabilities do not necessarily penalize reported profits...at least not immediately. That's because, as we noted at the outset, companies may, within certain broad limits, include in their EXPECTED pension plan returns on their income statements instead of their actual returns. Last year, the difference between these two numbers was substantial. An actuarial Grand Canyon separated actual returns from expected returns.

"Although pension-fund assets lost $90 billion in 2001, an accounting sleight-of-hand allowed companies to show that income of $104 billion had been generated, Zion says. If the smoothing mechanisms were eliminated, aggregate earnings for the S&P 500 would have dropped by 69% last year," Doherty observes.

Investors would do well to remember that accounting practices can obscure more than they reveal. "Pension plan accounting is hiding a lot of landmines," says Apogee's Tracy.

Watch your step.

Eric Fry,
for The Daily Reckoning