Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (64080)	10/25/2002 8:44:30 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Have you discussed it with your 3D presence? She may suggest a more compassionate and reasonable explanation. I'm not trying to start something between the two of you but ... the two of you??? well whatever.

To: epicure who wrote (64080)	10/25/2002 9:11:13 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Interesting. So tell us the correct shape iyo of the 'bent' one you claim I've evoked, in the incident we're talking about. Use blanks for names, or numbers-- Person 1, Person 2, like that. I'm just curious, is all. I know you do threaten to sue people (N and me for example), using lawyerspeak to retain later deniability if you need it yet making them believe the threat is of a lawsuit, they not being mindreaders. So really I'm curious about how you are managing to massage that incident so that there was no 3D lawsuit threat there, either. Odd that Person 2 got her own counsel. Good trick on her, counselor! You and your client didn't really mean sue at all! And she believed!, neener neener neener! How do I know you won't give say? Call me Kreskin. Edit: siliconinvestor.com Good. You know what you've done, so share it, since my version is 'bent.' Straighten it out! Signed, Kreskin