Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (64266)	10/26/2002 8:59:14 PM
From: E	Respond to of 82486

I didn't believe you were going to sue. That's why I sent the defiant third haha message. I believed you were threatening to. For two very bright people, you obviously have no conception about the time involved in a law suit- between litigants in two different states, over EMAIL? I mean how ridiculous is that? I'm glad you think we're "very" bright. I figured we were bright enough to know when a lawsuit was being threatened by a nutjob, but "very" is a compliment, thank you! I love your "over EMAIL? I mean how ridiculous is that?" It is ridiculous, isn't it? Such a big fuss you made "over EMAIL"! Even bringing it up again a couple of days ago, after all those apologies. So ridiculous. But then... there was the pain and suffering of the hallucinations and all, but I didn't know about those. Maybe you should reconsider. Not everyone would see it as you do. Check out this opinion, about a single unsolicited fax: Message 16676408 I consider your denial that your FIRST NOTICE SECOND NOTICE emails containing the threat to take unnamed but very specific action that we would NOT LIKE quite remarkable. I note your language with real interest. You appear to say you didn't intend us to think you were threatening to sue, but you don't. You say two slightly different things. 1)"It never occurred to me you would think I would sue you." (I didn't think that. I said haha, in fact. I only thought you threatened to sue me. That's quite different, dear. You, on the other hand, believe that whatever it was you threatened us with is was dire enough that it caused a cessation in what would probably have been, oh, like, lots and lots of emails, maybe going on for weeks or months, right?) 2) "Honestly, I don't remember thinking about you thinking about a law suit." (I can believe you don't remember right this minute what you were "thinking about" all those months ago. Or at least that you can say that now without too much moral discomfiture. Memories get massaged. But I know and you know that there was a threat from an attorney with a FIRST NOTICE and a SECOND NOTICE and you were threatening to do something specific and we WOULD NOT LIKE IT. Now possibly you had in mind putting out a contract with the Mafia, but that didn't occur to me, Attorney.)