SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (54977)10/27/2002 1:58:45 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 281500
 
I assume Powell has a fairly thick skin by now and these things don't deny him anything. He may even find them funny.

With all the dumping the neocons have done on Powell in the past year, I imagine he has quite the thick skin. Heck, even wimpy neo-liberal Kinsley was dumping on him for leakage contrary to the war party line a few weeks ago. The local bunched-undies thing with Belafonte is one of the stranger group think episodes I recall here, and with all the Debka-style "dot connecting" that happens, that's saying something.



To: JohnM who wrote (54977)10/27/2002 2:09:20 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
but the view is not all that unusual in some black circles.

And that makes it right??

The white view of blacks in many parts of the south are considered "racist". Should they use the same logic you appear to be using?? That it might be stupid, but it's forgivable because it occurs in "white circles"??

This is insulting on two levels. First it diminishes Powell's achievement merely because his views don't match Belafonte's. And Powell can't counter with a reciprocal analogy about Belefonte because it's beneath his dignity.

Secondly, it implies that Bush is a slave master with a few token blacks, something I would personally find VERY offensive were it directed toward myself. But Bush has been MORE progressive towards placing QUALIFIED blacks in high positions of responsibility that was even the Clinton administration.

Why not just call it racism John?? Why even dignify it as merely "dumb"??

As for "my prejudice," I gather you think that folk who don't agree with your view on this are prejudiced.

Nope. Just morally compromised. At least with regard to the topic at hand.

I don't have to agree with your views John.. But neither will I use some form of "race-baiting" to claim that you've been handed your position by virtue of meeting some equal opportunity quota if it's plainly apparent that you have more than sufficient qualifications for the job.

What Belafonte said was despicable.. But despicable as it is, it is surpassed by your vain attempt to dignify Belafonte's actions...

Hawk@sickofracebaitersandthepeoplewhodefendthem.com



To: JohnM who wrote (54977)10/27/2002 3:31:52 PM
From: epsteinbd  Respond to of 281500
 
JohnM, don't you think that sometimes, when the pressure gets too high, Bush pushes Condolizza into the Clinton Suite, while Powell does the human ventilator like in the good ole days; while some scratched record of the Bellafonte dude covers the master tarzaning the Rice bowl ?



To: JohnM who wrote (54977)10/28/2002 2:00:55 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
As for your question, my own view is that Belafonte did a rather dumb thing politically by criticizing Powell that way, but the view is not all that unusual in some black circles. Not at all unusual for folk to be critical of those in power and if you are black to use that kind of language. I thought Powell handled it well.

Belefonte called Powell a "house nigger" and "race traitor" in not so many words. Does that make it clearer for you, John?

Derek