Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (9972)	10/28/2002 7:40:57 PM
From: Challo Jeregy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

they haven't had any trouble starting gap openings yet, as far as I see. maybe this way, we gap up 400 points instead of 100 -g-

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (9972)	10/28/2002 8:07:04 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57110

Jorj, that is an interesting thought about ramping MSFT futures a couple points. Individual stock futures can provide enormous leeway for those in the PITS as a hedge against QQQ OI or to drive the QQQ more easily where they want it to go. Can we now expect the 3:30 AM "invisible hand" futures pump on MSFT INTC and CSCO. Yikes! Could this be cheaper than messing with the entire index? M