SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lee who wrote (14900)10/29/2002 10:48:28 AM
From: robert b furman  Respond to of 19219
 
HI Steve,

I agree with your concept.

But in total - the % changes occurring are no more than the productivity improvements that advanced technology and the imbalances it creates have caused.

These are not secular declines.

Historically this last recession would be labeled the weakest - a recessionette if you will.

It is the result of tight monetary policy in early to late 00.

The rate lowering and money pumping and it related lags(12-18 months)are now pulling us out into what could only be called exactly what the doctor ordered A SOFT LANDING.

Then all these doomsayers thru deductive reasoning assign bubbles to all quality companies in the population.They label it a secular bear and project its length to 18 years.

This kind prognostication is as absurd as the guru's calling 36,000 in March of 2000.

NO ONE - IREPEAT NO ONE has a chrystal ball.

Its just the same MOMO mongers extrapolating the current trend into the ridiculous.

MUMBO JUMBO B.S.

Just watch the high frequency numbers - not one single number makes a trend and itis ok to put your hands down - the SKY ISN"T FALLING.gg

Bob



To: Steve Lee who wrote (14900)10/29/2002 11:40:06 PM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
Steve Lee - should we bring back the candlemakers who lost their jobs to Edison's lightbulb too?That would create more jobs ,right?



To: Steve Lee who wrote (14900)10/30/2002 2:16:55 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 19219
 
Haven't you ever heard the term "creative destruction"?...