To: Edscharp who wrote (2653 ) 10/30/2002 3:31:21 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Respond to of 2746 Re: I've not said a word about Sharon, but you make presumptions about my views on this. Likewise, I've never said a word about Saddam, but you make presumptions about my views on this. Re: Both sides were very close to a negotiated solution when Israel was willing to concede about 97% of the Palestinians land claims,... That's the Judeofascist propaganda that used to be spun again and again by the pro-Israel media... As I said, you can keep those 97% BUT give up on the remaining 3%, namely, East Jerusalem. Relinquish Israeli sovereignty over East Jerusalem and 99.9999% of the Mideast crisis will be over. Re: I still accuse you of being the ultimate hypocrite. Your reference to Israel as "judeofascists" is a clear indication of some deep seated bias, and I certainly haven't seen you refer to Saddam Hussein or Arafat as "islamicfascists". Hypocrite?!? In what capacity should I be an hypocrite? Listen: as a born-again atheist, I don't give a damn about Jerusalem --hence I don't see why that city couldn't be EQUALLY shared by Muslims and Jews (and Christians). As for your equating Saddam with Arafat, that's another cheap trick by Judeofascist spinmeisters: Saddam Hussein is a head of state whereas Yasser Arafat is still a freedom fighter --Arafat is the Gerry Adams of the Middle East. Would Irish Americans call Mr G. Adams, leader of the Sinn Fein, a Fascist??? However, you may have a point on Saddam: he is a fascist, although not an "islamofascist" since he never used Islam as an ideological machine to prop up his regime. Keep in mind that Iraq's chief diplomat Tareq Aziz is Christian ...(*) Then again, which Mideast regime isn't fascist one way or the other? Israel is a Judeofascist garrison-state cloaked in a parody of democracy, Saudi Arabia is an Islamic plutocracy, Russia is a Judeofascist mobocracy, India is but a hellish hindufascist anthill (BJP, intouchables), and so on. Gus (*) outtherenews.com