Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Madharry who wrote (15708)	10/31/2002 6:36:28 AM
From: Larry S.	Respond to of 78523

Is he a friend of Martha?? eom

To: Madharry who wrote (15708)	10/31/2002 2:41:02 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78523

Madharry, yes, still have a small HRC position. While headline says Chairman Scrushy was cleared, the smaller headline, "law firm finds no evidence" is what I'm focused on. In Enron it finally came out how Enron management cleverly limited the scope of their hired attorneys' investigation. Even if the scope wasn't limited here with HRC, I don't trust that lawyers are competent to conduct an investigation, or are even unbiased. Consequently, I don't jump to the conclusion that since Scrushy's "cleared", therefore he's innocent. Put differently, I spit on Chairman Scrushy...the slimeball. (-g-) I'll hold on to my HRC stock for now. My advice to others though would be to look elsewhere. Where management interests would be aligned with those of shareholders. jmo