SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (58152)10/31/2002 10:56:50 AM
From: JRI  Respond to of 209892
 
What if the wedge is/was the valid pattern here, but the delay in breaking was a function of EOM/EOY save by the powers that be...this "delay" thus faking out most chartwatchers into thinking the pattern was dead/dying..

I'll come up with anything to justify my positions g,ng



To: At_The_Ask who wrote (58152)10/31/2002 10:59:45 AM
From: Shack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
As for tech, we look like we have retested the broken COMP wedge and put in a double top to me.

As for non-tech, the key is if the BKX H&S is real. A break of 762 there would probably send it reeling.

Although we really look like we could use the 'throwover' on the C wedge.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News