SEC Chairman Pitt Asks Probe of Webster's Selection (Update1) By Neil Roland
Washington, Oct. 31 (Bloomberg) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission ordered a probe of the selection of William Webster as head of a new accounting oversight board, after Chairman Harvey Pitt failed to tell fellow commissioners Webster headed the audit committee of a company sued for fraud.
Webster told Pitt about the allegations against U.S. Technologies Inc. ``shortly'' before Pitt and two Republicans on the SEC elected the former FBI director by a 3-2 vote on Friday, the New York Times reported today. Pitt requested an investigation following the article's publication.
Pitt, whose ties to the accounting business have drawn criticism ever since his appointment by President George W. Bush in August 2001, chose Webster to head the new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board over Democratic objections that Webster wasn't fit for the job. Today's revelations fueled calls for Pitt to go.
``The president should finally begin to restore investor confidence by appointing an SEC chairman devoted to the public interest, not the accounting industry,'' said House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, a Missouri Democrat. Pitt ``is not behaving in a trustworthy manner.''
Walter Stachnik, the SEC inspector general charged with investigating Webster's selection, didn't respond to a request for comment. Neither Pitt nor Webster returned calls to their Washington offices. Stachnik reports to both Pitt and to Congress, SEC spokesman John Heine said.
The SEC's staff was informed of Webster's work at U.S. Technologies, and ``the commission staff identified nothing of concern after reviewing the situation,'' said Christi Harlan, an SEC spokeswoman.
Botched Responsibility
``Mr. Pitt has botched one of his most important responsibilities following enactment of the corporate reform bill last summer,'' said Representative Edward Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts and a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. ``It appears that he purposely withheld information that clearly was material and relevant to the vote last week.''
Webster, a former federal judge and director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, headed a three-person audit committee at U.S. Technologies, a company delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market in 1996 whose shares now trade for less than a penny a share. Among the company's activities was using prisoners to perform ``labor intensive work'' for Fortune 1000 companies, according to the company's website.
Webster's audit committee voted in 2001 to dismiss U.S. Technologies' outside auditors, BDO Seidman LLP, after they raised concerns about the company's internal controls, the Times said. Webster himself left the U.S. Technologies board after he said he was told the company could no longer provide him with insurance against claims by investors, the Times said.
Control Weaknesses
U.S. Technologies and its chief executive, C. Gregory Earls, are facing lawsuits from investors who say they were defrauded of millions of dollars. Earls has been accused of using investor funds for his own purposes, including refurbishing a personal residence and to make personal investments, according to a complaint filed against him in Superior Court in Washington in May 2001.
BDO Seidman notified the audit committee of weakness in internal controls on finances and accounting, failures to promptly record material transactions and deficiencies in the organization and retention of financial and accounting records. Webster told the Times he didn't look into most of these issues, though he said U.S. Technologies was concerned about BDO Seidman's bills and the length of time it took to perform the audits.
Democrats will work to change the accounting oversight law next year to limit the SEC's discretion over the oversight board if they gain control of the House and Senate after next week's election, said Representative Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat and senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, in an interview.
Too Passive
``Judge Webster's behavior is part of what we're trying to correct,'' said Frank, who called for both Webster and Pitt to resign. ``As chair of an audit committee, he was much too passive in the face of accusations.''
Gephardt said Pitt's endorsement of Webster over John Biggs, the former head of the TIAA-CREF pension fund, ``defied the spirit'' of the new accounting industry oversight law.
Biggs, when asked about what happened with the nomination said, ``Harvey Goldschmid told the truth.''
Goldschmid said last week he and Pitt had met with Biggs in September and said he would be endorsed as head of the new board by all the SEC commissioners. ``But the audit lobby squeezed the House Republicans,'' he said.
Roel Campos, one of the two Democratic SEC commissioners, said he wasn't told by Pitt about Webster's connection to U.S. Technologies before the vote. Goldschmid declined to comment today. The Republican commissioners, Paul Atkins and Cynthia Glassman, didn't return calls for comment.
President Bush continues to support Pitt as chairman, White House spokesman Claire Buchan said.
``Judge Webster has a long career and is respected on both sides of the aisle as an individual of integrity,'' Buchan said. ``We're pleased Chairman Pitt will be reviewing the process used in appointing the members to the oversight board.''
Corzine, McCain
The White House was ``not made aware of this information until it was brought to our attention by the New York Times,'' said Dan Bartlett, Bush's director of communications.
Pitt had told the Senate Banking Committee earlier this year that ``part of the responsibility corporate leaders have to investors and the market is complete and accurate disclosure,'' said Darius Goore, a spokesman for Senator Jon Corzine, Democrat of New Jersey and a panel member. ``It now appears the chairman himself is not living up to his own tenets.''
Corzine is drafting a letter today to President Bush on the latest revelation about Webster's background.
``This just reaffirms Sen. McCain's long held view that Mr. Pitt should be replaced,'' said Rebecca Hanks, a spokeswoman for Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona.
``Pitt's days are numbered,'' said Charles Mulford, accounting professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. ``At best this is a mistake. At worst it's negligence. Either way it makes Pitt look bad.'' |