Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (65069)	10/31/2002 3:05:37 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 82486

"My behavior was never legally harassing," Kinda sounds like 'no controlling legal authority"...don't you think....? Its what it sounds like when you know you "done" wrong but are not man enough to admit it and apologize.

To: one_less who wrote (65069)	10/31/2002 4:00:25 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 82486

Since I am the only person I know on SI who is a lawyer who actually deals on a regular basis with the laws on harassment and judicial decison on what does and does not constitute harassment, I stand by my evaluation. I understand -- or at least I was told -- that SI was specifically asked to ban me for harassment in violation of the TOU, and declined to do so. As to JLA painting himself into a corner, for crying out loud, he's a lawyer. He's trained to evaluate what is and, much more important, what isn't said. If indeed, which I don't necessarily accept, he got snookered because he couldn't properly parse what was written, shame on him. Yes, Laz did admit me to SMBR under specific conditions, which I complied with but he booted me anyhow. Hardly being in my corner. I really see no need to rehash all of these points otherwise. </i? I agree. I have long since and frequently stated my willingness to forgive all, let the dead past bury its past, and move on. Sadly, not everyone here has reached that level of maturity yet.