Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (65167)	10/31/2002 6:15:44 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Just so we're clear, if you choose to post on this thread, I will treat you as I would any other poster here. If you don't want me posting to you, you can put me on Ignore, or you can post on places that have been set up for you where I am prohibited from posting. Your choice.

To: Poet who wrote (65167)	10/31/2002 6:40:46 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You realize the whole apology thing arises from assertions about CH's character and actions, right? That's what this whole thing was about, on both sides, assertions about character and action. You are the one who kept saying you told CH all this personal stuff which should have made him more sensitive to you (he should have known better, yadayadayada). I'm sure you remember how all this started. You said he knew things (personal things) that you told him in private. That was in your posts. Now you are saying that referring to what you yourself posted about months ago demeans your character and that those PM's may or may not exist! If this is true you demeaned your own character first. Apparently you also alluded to things that might or might not exist. Although I suppose if you allude to them they exist, and if CH does they don't. That seems par for the course around here.