Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Raptor's Den -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (5014)	11/1/2002 6:45:59 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10157

Same here. It just sits and spins.

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (5014)	11/1/2002 8:32:30 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10157

Shack, AA- Don't know what happened to that link- but it talked about a bunch of negative divergences developing this past week (ones we've picked up on), and that the author believes indicates that this move can not go much higher, 6-7% and then collapse (not just minimal retrace). The point I found most interesting: author claimed that he looked at 15 years of AAII data, and had only rarely seen the huge % swing from bears to bulls (that we've seen in just week). He claims that- on the rare times it has happened, it has led to a spike-y top, and harsh turnaround- essentially it represents dumb money getting way too anxious that they are missing a rally. John M. point earlier this week was that AAII numbers have been higher, and can remain that way for a while. However, John M. did not address/comment the velocity of change. That's what this guy is doing, and stating that historically speaking it dooms this continuation of the rally to a 6-7% spike max. (and in next few days) and then DOWN.