Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (65379)	11/2/2002 8:57:06 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

..."you have always entertained them with equanimity if not support or agreement"..."So my point is that your contretemps with X is a function of the CH-Poet thing. And, as you said, it won't be fixed by CH's apology." You are mistaken. I have not always entertained X with equanimity! Certainly, I have tried to be polite, though... You do impy in your words that I may be biased. You are right. I was brought up to believe in the family unit and the extended family of friends...and to rely on internal discipline and judgment. "What about his position that posters aren't real?" That is not his "position"...LOL!!! That is just phoney. If he was genuinely turning over a leaf, he would disavow that. Idiotic nonsense from lawyers are clearly part of gamesmanship...<ggg> "So my point is that your contretemps with X is a function of the CH-Poet thing" But you are wrong. The "CH-Poet thing" (as you say) simply polarized X and brought out parts of her personality that individuals responded to as individuals. "Presumably he would still hold that position, even if he regretted his behavior with Poet." No. He has never held that view. That was all defensive pretense...