To: Letmebe Frank who wrote (544 ) 11/4/2002 4:31:16 AM From: VAUGHN Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 613 Hello Frank I've done that in the past and not been particularly happy with the degree of technical information she was able to communicate. I e-mailed her husband per his invitation on TWG's news releases but Roswitha has made a habit of replying for him, which I find annoying as hell. I was under the impression that TWG announced the completion of their financing in late August so I am just a little confused if that is still an issue. I would dearly like to see TWG adopt the NR pattern, quality and frequency of information release that DDN has exhibited. The share price would no doubt be far more buoyant and shareholders no doubt, far more willing to be loyal. Anyway, I patiently await Hermann's response to my latest e-mail. Regarding the Idaho gold deposit, I was under the impression that that deposit would not be profitable until gold was much higher so while I am always interested in producing assets supporting share price, I don't understand development of that deposit at this time and feel that it is draining resources better invested in proving up JI. I should probably add that the dual commodity role was a major issue and anchor on the share price of Major General and quite a number of other junior plays hence their spin-off of Commander/Diamonds North, etc. So developing the Idaho deposit can only confuse the market not help the share price. Get on with JI exploration and prove up significant mine able ore deposits and grades, that should be TWG's one and only focus if management wants to remotely come close to their stated start-up date which is rapidly becoming a joke. Nothing ticks off shareholders more than trying to do too much with too little. Do one thing, do what you say you were going to do and do it on schedule. That instils confidence, trust and loyalty. My two sense. Regards Vaughn