Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 10:55:46 AM
From: marginmike	Respond to of 436258

yes bring him back

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 10:57:50 AM
From: bruceleroy1_-	Respond to of 436258

my vote is to unban

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 10:58:16 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<so let's hear the votes. if the group wants him back then that's fine.>> I vote to let him back...it's not like he's gonna be posting over here all day long or anything. Doesn't hurt to hear what the other side thinks once in a while....

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:00:16 AM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 436258

stay

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:02:22 AM
From: Roads End	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

ok

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:03:09 AM
From: superfiggpart2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

so far its 4-0 to reinstate---ill just follow our instinctual herd mentality that is so obviously showned in the market as well,, and vote for the majority--even thou i might disagree lol

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:19:40 AM
From: Bid Buster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

he's a clown..but if you want to unban him its ok by me..i can still fade him.

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:20:39 AM
From: At_The_Ask	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Unban with the understanding that if someone asks him if he's drunk or on crack not to take it personally.

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:26:13 AM
From: GraceZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Unban. I think anyone who irritates you enough to actually get you to debate an issue deserves a chance to post. Not that anyone here cares what I think. <g>

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:27:11 AM
From: ild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Bring Zeev back

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:33:22 AM
From: Bull RidaH	Respond to of 436258

keep 'em banned til he takes his "teddy-bear" suit off... Then we can examine him a little more thoroughly to see if he is truly worthy. -g-

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:43:48 AM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Luc, Zeev, yes unban. I don't agree with everything he writes but he is not a clown -g- mike

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 11:45:27 AM
From: Terry Maloney	Respond to of 436258

Nice post. I think you already know my position on banning. <g>

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 12:00:37 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

unban 'em all and just ban them if they are disruptive or use the F-word too much <vbg>

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 12:58:49 PM
From: JHP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

bring zeev back

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 1:14:21 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

let him stay. if you need to ban someone, ban tippet if he doesn't cover today. -g-

To: Lucretius who wrote (202059)	11/4/2002 1:40:41 PM
From: RJL	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Let him back in. He may have clownish views, but he's no dummy.