SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (65673)11/4/2002 3:22:23 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
If he hasn't been wronged, then no one acted improperly....



To: Lane3 who wrote (65673)11/4/2002 3:36:36 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I'm not sure I get that.

One can both do wrong things and be wronged, can't one?

If they acted improperly, why would you say that those who acted improperly didn't wrong me?



To: Lane3 who wrote (65673)11/4/2002 4:04:07 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Reading today's news I was struck by one minor parallel between the situation here and that in the Middle East. Obviously they are very different in scope, history, depth of passion (at least I hope nobody here has the desire to start suicide bombing other posters), etc.,

But in one way they seem quite similar. Both sides, in their hearts of hearts, probably recognize that they have gone overboard at certain times in the way they have acted toward the other. But neither one is willing to publicly admit it until the other is, too.

And there's the neutral observer. Amnesty International has accused both sides in the Middle East conflict of human rights violations. You, here, have charged both sides with improper posting. But in neither case is that adequate to bring the sides to reconciliation.

How can we possible believe it is possible to achieve peace in the Middle East if we can't even achieve it here?