Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (154538)	11/6/2002 4:03:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578921

David, <Oil is important to use for strategic reasons, and there is nothing wrong with us going to war if those interests are or may be threatened.> Actually, I'll disagree with you here. I'd prefer it if oil weren't so important, either for strategic or economic reasons. When I said that the world revolves around oil, I'm stating a sad reality, not a policy or a direction to follow. This is a reality that liberals want to see changed, and so do I. The difference is that liberals will resort to socialism or wishful thinking to get there, while I'd rather see it done through the free market. By the way, I remember Bush at one time was praising fuel-cell technology. In his happy-go-lucky manner, he mentioned that it could help America depend a lot less on foreign oil, thereby bankrupting the terrorists. That is not something a greedy oil barron would say, except to pay lip service (which I'm sure the Dems would accuse Bush of doing). Tenchusatsu