Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (77)	11/6/2002 4:33:15 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Wouldn't make a difference there. If the NJ courts had followed the law and not allowed Lautenberg to be placed on the ballot, I think (and the Democrats obviously agreed) that the Republicans would have won that seat, for an additional seat in the Senate. The law was clear; the judges just decided they should override the clear statement of the legislature through its deliberative processes and change the law on their own to benefit one political party. Whether you're a Democrat, Republican, Green, Libertarian, or whatever, that should disturb you.