Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (154561)	11/6/2002 7:22:01 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578445

Al, <Show me how there have not been conflicting policy statements coming out different cabinet members of the White House.> I already have. Everything revolves around disarmament. Going through the U.N. is mainly P.R. since everyone knows how irrelevant U.N. resolutions are. Advocating regime change is stating the obvious: that Saddam will not willingly agree to disarmament. Disarming Iraq is the ultimate goal, and Rumsfeld has made that clear time and time again. So has Powell (the so-called "dove" that liberals love to bring up). If we can do that through diplomacy, great. If not, other means become necessary. <I have made my case. Make yours.> The only thing consistent in your arguments is your belief that Bush just wants oil. If that's what you want to believe, be my guest. I've heard those arguments made during Desert Shield, and they turned out to be nonsense. Why should those arguments impress me now? Tenchusatsu