Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (4720)	11/6/2002 10:16:13 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

well Peter you got me this time....I went and read the entire post even though it's not one of your quality posts where you contribute good stuff. ------ Any post where I can show others attempts to discredit my strategy have no real basis in fact or data is a good post. They ,the postings, show it works and works well. And that it can and does stand up to anything others may throw at it. ----------- So what if Lorne called NT a basket case. I think it's more a turd actually LOL, but someone bought it in the 0.70's and someone's selling here in the 2.20's. Maybe it's Lorne I dunno. I sure wish it was me though :o) -------- I know its not Lorne. By way of that very exchange in that posting. And I also know that a few of the lurkers to this forum were taken by my insights from that discussion of LUS.UN and MXT.UN and NT and my strategy. That they told me they took that as good enough evidence for them to risk buying NT between $0.67 and $1.00. Things like that are real time proof positive of my strategies success. Lorne or other superior traders can not hope to match that and don't or can't or won't. And that shows how successfull they and their strategy is. ----------------- All I can say about your concern for J6P is that I'd wager that most people still posting about stocks here have at least survived. Personally I'm up nicely. Could have been up a lot more and was but up is up. I don't run out and buy stocks because Lorne ----- But some others (joe) may -------------- or Scott or George or Peter posts about them but they certainly make it to the top of my to be checked list. Then it's my problem. ----- The trouble is that those others (joe) don't know how to check properly or even where to look for confirmation or verification. And those that should know (like Lorne) should say so (give that evidence) if they are genuine but they do not. The owness is always on joe to do the due diligence. Perhaps it should be the owness of those that make the superior claims to back themselves up instead. Making joes life just a little easier. I do that. ------ ------- You can't save the world Peter. Even if everything posted was always 100% stupid greedy people would still find a way to lose money. ------- If your given 100% beforehand your going to make the right decision. Losing money isnt going to happen because you dont do the stupid or the greedy you just stick to the facts ----------- When you make money trading warrants aren't you taking someone else's money ? ------- When I make money either by trading or by way of the trusts income its by doing the smart thing at the time given all the facts all the data all the information using a verifiable strategy. Saying its from taking someone elses money isnt the correct story. And its rather a lame attempt on your part to turn my being a documented successful investor who is willing to share what he does and gets with others into something else. I had thought you previously above that sort of thing. Guess I was wrong. ---------------