Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (316413)	11/7/2002 6:41:44 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That does it....case closed!!

To: Ish who wrote (316413)	11/7/2002 6:45:04 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Hmmm, sounds like we need a new international treaty....

To: Ish who wrote (316413)	11/7/2002 6:48:50 PM
From: Mr. Palau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That makes those buy now, pay later offers look pretty good.

To: Ish who wrote (316413)	11/7/2002 7:45:19 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

So jump in your SUV and........drive? LOL.

To: Ish who wrote (316413)	11/7/2002 8:15:24 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Thanks Ish - I just ordered a new saddle that I was putting off until next year. I guess I will buy that new Featherlite with living quarters on the weekend. Now to pay a visit to my next door neighbor that shot my cat.

To: Ish who wrote (316413)	11/8/2002 1:03:35 AM
From: JEB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

NASA has been studying this for years and they won't go that far but they have acknowledged the warming effect and elevated super flares. This guy might be overstretching a bit, ...then again, ...he may be right on the money. NASA has noted the sun was turning from Hydrogen to Helium fuel and that the rays from the sun have progressively changed creating more skin cancer. There has been a debate in science recently that the sun was creating this global warming effect (not man-made) and others say the sun's effects are negligible to their models. I think this guy may be stirring up debate to get others to completely repudiate his theorem. They may be able to repudiate his final conclusion but will have a hard time damning his whole theorem.