Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alomex who wrote (149753)	11/7/2002 8:45:10 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

So bottom line, you are wrong. You made a fallacious claim you now admit is untrue.

To: Alomex who wrote (149753)	11/7/2002 9:42:51 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Irrelevant details? You mean like how your "point" changed as soon as you figured out you were flat out wrong? Here's your post, including the line of the profile you objected to: "and during the Vietnam War era Bush served as a pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. He did not. There is no record of Bush Jr. ever setting a foot in a National Guard air base. In all likelihood his father pulled a few strings and got him off." Now, how is what you said even remotely correct? Oh, wait, now you want to redefine the word "serve" to mean "fought in"? What do the little underscores before and after "serve" mean? Is that like making little quotation mark gestures with your hands while emphasizing a spoken word? "My point was that he did not _serve_ during Vietnam." Sorry, but I don't think even GST would try that one. PS: I'm also waiting for you to show where he "lies about his service record."