Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter W. Panchyshyn who wrote (4763)	11/9/2002 12:00:26 PM
From: gg cox	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11633

Kastel..off topic again<<ggg>> Peter You said. ""----- Thats exactly what you have been doing.Thats what those guys from those examples you gave have been doing." I could be crying like a baby and then maybe not...you don't know..maybe the Wallmart Greeter and the doctor are .. it appears they have lots to cry about.."real life." You said.. "Whats the matter having a hard time to dispute the simple math of it. Once again , 300% - 90% = 210%. Thats a 210% The simple math of it is this, if you take Your"chart" of NT from it's begining to the present and applied your "method" you would not only have purchased it in the $ 1 to $10 range but also in the $70 To $120 range and as it dipped in these high ranges over the years you would be buying more.. when it dipped below $60 you like the wallmart greeter and the doctor would have been buying more and like so many others as it fell to $50 more $40more..."this is a dip it will come back" $20 more..Loans to buy more, PLC's..mortgage the house a la teevee..I think when you do the simple math ...You would end up like the Wallmart greeter..You contend that because it was trading between $1 and $.67 that you could have bought so much more at these prices it would make up for all the high end entry levels..Try selling that to loans officer as a sure thing when you tell him your story.No the simply math is not a 210% gain..and also we would never know..because you never sell...a simple poll could end the debate( if anyone is reading this anymore).. At the present time NT trading around $2,(including all the NT splits)using Peter's method begining to present and assuming Peter does not have unlimited funds as in "real life" would Peter have a gain ..I say no. gg ----- Thats exactly what you have been doing. Thats what those guys from those examples you gave have been doing. Whats the matter having a hard time to dispute the simple math of it. Once again , 300% - 90% = 210%. Thats a 210% gain. You cant understand that how are you going to understand anything else. Anything else like the math of my strategy. --------------