Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (149834)	11/9/2002 4:38:45 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164684

>>No. I sold Sonus. My only longs are TVIN, TIVO, and GD. I'm thinking that September is a write-off for tech. We'll have to see if we get an emotional sell-off.<< Bill all Gst was asking is when did you dump SONS? I'm assuming it was before Sept 19 2002. Message 18010585

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (149834)	11/11/2002 7:30:25 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<Bush gets exactly what the US wants: Saddam's surrender one way or the other> Thre is a new UN resolution -- it is a "dirsarm or else resolution" not a "regime change" resolution. If Iraq complies with the UN resolution, the US will be left to decide whether or not to invade anyway. It is virtually impossible to disarm Saddam in terms that will suit the US -- that has been obvious through this whole process. The UN resolution will be seen by the rest of the world as a fair process -- and if that process is followed by Iraq it will be very tough to persuade anybody of the legitimacy of a US invasion. This is not the resolution the US wanted -- but the US needed some form of resolution very badly and this is the one we now have. It is certainly far better than anything that preceded it and infinitely better than no resolution.