Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: niceguy767 who wrote (9042)	11/9/2002 6:58:15 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14464

Hi NiceGuy, I couldn't get that link up, but did you mean this invitation? messages.yahoo.com If so, I wouldn't worry too much. One way or another we will get the answer. I can understand why RMTR would not want to distribute that kind of "spin," ...particularly if its true.<g> If the comparative costs for stand alone chips do fall out in a fashion similar to embedded, all the industry players with half a brain will already know it. And after the "Bus Company" made such a mess of "The Revolution" thingy, I'd expect RMTR to let nature and the "cost" factor do the talking for them. ...And if I had any ideas about a method for solving the "destructive read" issue, I'd first talk to MU about a development deal to work it out. Cutting them in on a little of the action would certainly help prime the pump.<Hoo><Hoo> But that assumes FRAM is in fact the future Low Cost Memory in the stand alone DRAM/Flash space as well as embedded. If so, I'd work with MU and make INTC buy all the plane tickets and come begging! ...I'm sure the Hotels of Colorado Springs have seen a passle of Andy's Boys since 1997. No need to cut off their "revenue" now.<Hoo><Hoo> 0\|0