SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Those Damned Democrat's -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (780)11/10/2002 12:52:18 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 1604
 
Bill O'Reilly

November 9, 2002

The right stuff

URL:http://www.townhall.com/columnists/billoreilly/

It is indeed party time for the Grand Old Party as the right in America now has control of Congress and the presidency. But after all the lemonades are drained, there is one party pooper problem. Now, the Republicans actually have to accomplish things. There are no excuses any longer.

The federal government must immediately confront three issues that are vital to Americans. No. 1 is stopping the relentless flow of illegal immigrants into the United States. The census bureau estimates there could be as many as 13 million undocumented aliens currently running around this country unsupervised. Even if that number is high, the problem is simply out of control. Keep in mind that one of the accused snipers, John Lee Malvo, was in the country illegally, as were three of the 9-11 killers. The problem of illegal immigration puts all Americans at risk.

Both the northern and southern borders are currently wide open, and the Border Patrol will tell you that it does not have the manpower to even dent the flow of illegal aliens and dangerous drugs into the United States. There is only one solution that would have an immediate impact -- deploying the military to back up the Border Patrol.

According to a poll taken last summer by Fox News, 79 percent of Americans support using the military to help secure the borders of the United States. But that overwhelming number does not seem to include our elected officials in Washington. Very few of them support militarizing the border. The reasons range from citing the arcane Posse Commitatus law to fearing a Hispanic voter backlash. But laws can be changed, and politics should not intrude on the public safety. If U.S. forces can control the area between North and South Korea, they can stabilize El Paso, Texas, and Tucson, Ariz.

The second issue the Republicans must deal with is out-of-control government spending and the high rate of taxation on working Americans. I live on Long Island, and working families here pay the highest taxes in the nation. Also, housing costs are through the roof, pardon the pun. It is not an exaggeration to say that a family of four living in or near New York City, or places like Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Chicago needs a six-figure income to afford even a decent house. That means that teachers, cops, firemen, carpenters and the like have salaries that often will not allow them to buy a home. This is an outrage.

The problem is that the government does not watch the money. The General Accounting Office estimates that billions of tax dollars are stolen or wasted every year. There is no central authority on the federal level to track where the money goes. The GAO is only called in after there's a misappropriation. The Justice Department has an Office of Budget and Management Services, the president has the Office of Management and Budget, and the legislators have the Congressional Budget Office. None of these overseers work together. It is a chaotic mess.

If President Bush and the GOP were to reorganize spending oversight effectively, it would save billions, and the working American could get a meaningful tax cut, not a couple of hundred bucks. Hey, Mr. President, watch the money, and control spending like a responsible private company would. Put Dick Cheney in charge, he's a bottom-line guy. If the Republicans don't control spending now, the party ought to hang it up.

Finally, the scandal of public education in America must be addressed, and here's how to do it: Every school district that accepts federal dollars must conform to an academic and disciplinary standard set by the Feds. That means school uniforms, not belly-exposing blouses. That means standardized tests, not feel-good self-esteem classes. And that means teachers that teach, not schmooze. Federal monitors in each state would evaluate local schools, and those that failed to impose a rigorous curriculum and intense discipline would lose their federal subsidies.

Of course the local school boards and many teachers unions would howl, but so what? You want an educated population or the continuing merry-go-round of students that cannot think, read or write? Public schooling in this country will not improve until serious reform takes place. The Republicans know it. But does the party have the guts to do it?

Someone once said, "with great power comes great responsibility." President Bush now has the power. But does he have the right stuff?

©2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.



To: calgal who wrote (780)11/10/2002 12:53:03 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 1604
 
ELECTION 2002

The Carson Show
With a wink and a nudge, Democrats gin up voter turnout.

BY JASON L. RILEY
Saturday, November 9, 2002 12:01 a.m. EST

URL:http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110002600

INDIANAPOLIS--It was 5:45 a.m. when I arrived, tired and a little cranky, at Rep. Julia Carson's home. It was dark and chilly, and my cotton raincoat proved entirely inadequate. But I forgot about all that as I approached the scene in front of her modest residence. Vans and SUVs were pulling in and out of the driveway, and scores of volunteers were funneling into the large garage attached to the house.

This was Election Day, and Ms. Carson, a black liberal Democrat first elected in 1996, had seen her poll advantage shrink in recent weeks. Her losing would still be an upset, but she couldn't get too confident. Pesky white suburbs had been redrawn into what is now Indiana's Seventh District, and that could dilute the influence of Ms. Carson's black base in Indianapolis proper. Moreover, her Republican opponent, a former Dan Quayle hand named Brose McVey, had turned out to be a formidable challenger. Ms. Carson was re-elected with a whopping 59% of the vote in 2000, but a less lopsided result was expected this go-round.

Hence, the congresswoman who had never lost an election was poised to pull out all the stops, and eager apparatchiks of the famed Democratic machine were arriving in predawn droves, quickly filling up her makeshift headquarters and awaiting orders. The Carson campaign had invited me to shadow some of these folks as they went about the day "getting out the vote." And we didn't waste any time.

By 6:15 a.m., I was in a minivan with three volunteers--two young ladies and a young man. One of the women was a Carson staffer; the other was on loan from House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt's staff. At one point the young man ordered the vehicle stopped. He hopped out, grabbed a Carson campaign sign from the back and placed it directly in front of a McVey sign along the road, so that other passersby wouldn't see the latter. (He was on loan from Rep. Cynthia McKinney's staff.)
"That's legal," said the Gephardt staffer, presumably for my benefit. "What's not legal is for us to pick up the McVey sign." Wink. Nudge. After transporting two volubly pro-Carson voters to the polls, this trio of legal sticklers dropped me back at headquarters. I didn't see much of them the rest of the day, so I've no idea what other ("legal") high jinks they were up to later on.

Next, I rode with Milton, a gregarious black gent, to pick up another Carson voter. Ms. Miner was an elderly black woman who said that she'd recently moved and hadn't brought along any ID. We went to a local school and accompanied her inside. The voting inspector, hired by Republicans, couldn't find her name in the registry and told her she'd have to fill out some paperwork before she'd be permitted to vote.

Milton became indignant. He told Ms. Miner to "come on and vote, and we'll worry about forms later." The distaff inspector, the only white person I saw, wasn't about to get in Milton's way as he escorted his charge to the booth. Afterward, while she was filling out the paperwork, I introduced myself to two poll workers and listened in as they discussed the incident.

"When our people come in," said one, referring to black voters, "I tell them, if you don't want to fill out paperwork, just use the old address." "What about the inspector?" said the other poll worker. "Don't worry about her," came the reply. "She dumb. She don't know nothin'." Wink. Nudge.

Back in the car, I asked Milton if what transpired was unusual. "Not really," he said. "I tell people they don't need ID. Don't let them hassle you." Doesn't the law require poll workers to ask for ID? I inquired. "Yeah," said Milton. "But sometimes [voters] get intimidated by that. It's a hassle, so I go in with them."

The law can be such a hassle sometimes.

Back at the garage, the weather was worrying people. It had started to rain around 8:30 and never let up. Turnout could be affected. One of the lawyers present--the local Democratic Party had dispersed around 100 for the day, three times more than usual--told me that the phone banks would have to step it up. Two gentlemen, Bill and Gil, offered to show me one of several. Along the way, Bill stressed that Ms. Carson's opponent had "underestimated her street smarts."

Giving folks rides to the polls initially struck me as an inefficient way of turning out the vote. But Bill said I was witnessing only a fraction of the operation. In total "three or four hundred" volunteers were providing transportation, and several thousand would vote as result. The Carson campaign was coordinating efforts with 30 churches and the local arm of the "unquestionably Democratic" AFL-CIO. It turned out that these phone banks were the real command central.
A wealthy local businessman and Democratic Party contributor had made available office space and phones for "Operation Big Vote," a supposedly nonpartisan 501(c)3 outfit run by an affable attorney named Aaron. There, some 30 people were busy making 10,000 to 15,000 calls, and 75 vehicles were being disbursed to accommodate the 3,000 incoming requests for rides. Others were on walkie-talkies with volunteers stationed at the polls. When word came back that turnout was low in an area, the phone-bank workers would check their voter registration lists. Callers would then go to work on that specific area.

Aaron tried to insist, straight-faced, that this wasn't a Democratic operation, but he kept having to remind people who walked through the door, including my two companions, to remove their Carson campaign hats and buttons. When I asked Aaron if there were any Republican volunteers working here, he laughed: "Our Republican is out to lunch right now. I'll let you know when he's back." Wink. Nudge.

Ms. Carson won comfortably with 53% of the vote. And like I did, a lot of Democrat activists in and around this city probably lost some sleep on Election Day. But I doubt it was over suspect tactics.

Mr. Riley is a senior editorial page writer at The Wall Street Journal.