Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ironyman who wrote (90996)	11/10/2002 4:15:14 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116906

Another good way to make good money is to go on SI, hype stock, and sell it to the greater fools. This is good money I have heard, as the promoters of Bre-X and IPMCF have proved. Crime pays. Ask Myer Rush, Bernie Cornfeld and the ever popular Guy LaMarche of eat-the-bullet fame at the PDA. We all know crime is where the money is. The Robber Barons, George Soros, WAC Bennet, Paul Desmarais, Sam Waksal, and even Bernard Baruch. Make it on insider trading. Screw the little guy. Sell the bad paper to the fools. We all know you have lots of MYNG paper. The game as we know is to unload that paper at a profit. It looks like you are hooked. As I will bet from your tone and discomfiture, you bought at the high a few years back and to the tune of a few million and now are trying to get it back up there in order to unload it to break even. I know lots of others in your boat in far more honest situations. The resource market has tanked face it. Even if MYNG was not a scam they would be hard pressed to get their stock back to 1997 levels when gold was better off. I know people with one million ounces independently proven, and more than one in that category and good grades and they cannot raise a sou. PLacer miners without one publishable drill hole are a drug on the market. I could take you to really good placer situation with 4000 drill holes! Situations with long history of production and 10's of million of yards very, very realistically proven and they cannot raise money. You would be far far better off to sell your MYNG, which will still be 35 cents 2 years from now, eat humble pie and invest what you have left in a real mine where we can make 80% on our money. I don't hate you. I don't hate your stock. I have invested in turkeys too. But if I did I did not start throwing rocks at people who pointed that out to me. If a mine has the gold, the price will follow. What is the point of selling stock in a placer mine in South America and not showing one independent result or one drill hole and independent assay for 4 years? The only point is to sell paper. Do they really think that Dome mines is going to take them over for a small placer mine with negligible ounces? I think not. I could take a stock public with 10 million yards of 10 dollar gold so proven that god would think twice about publishing a dissenting opinion. Dome or Franco Nevada would not lower themselves to buy one share. In 5 years we could mint 80 million pure profit. So that is bad? That is hooey because I can show 1000's of drill holes? But people who just do smoke and mirrors are better sorts of folks? I know about the crooks and the takeover artists and the theft of intellectual property and the fraud. But at a certain point a public company with title has to come clean. It's the law. I think it's only fair. Again I have YOUR interests at heart. (apologies to goaled tooter). I want to save YOU money. I am not out to IMPUGN YOUR character. A stock is a stock. I am not calling you an idiot for buying it, as we can all get fooled but at a certain point you have to wake up and smell the coffee? Want to make money? Want to make it in gold? I know how. And I know where too. If you want to follow the bouncing ball then let's invest in some real situations. Ones that will make real money. You won't have to risk trying to dump 4 million shares into a non existent market, for whatever reason it does not exist. EC<:-}

To: Ironyman who wrote (90996)	11/10/2002 11:18:55 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116906

<<If I didn't have a cheating lying ex-wife, I would tell you what is what>> While on the topic of gold diggers, I thought everyone was required to have at least one.