SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (56445)11/10/2002 2:11:50 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Victory of the Loud Little Handful
by Mark Twain

The loud little handful - as usual - will shout for the war. The
pulpit will - warily and cautiously - object... at first.

The great, big, dull bulk of the nation will rub its sleepy eyes
and try to make out why there should be a war,
and will say, earnestly and indignantly, "It is unjust and
dishonorable, and there is no necessity for it."

Then the handful will shout louder. A few fair men on the other
side will argue and reason against the war with
speech and pen, and at first will have a hearing and be
applauded, but it will not last long; those others will
outshout them, and presently the antiwar audiences will thin out
and lose popularity.

Before long, you will see this curious thing: the speakers
stoned from the platform, and free speech strangled
by hordes of furious men...

Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame
upon the nation that is attacked, and every man
will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will
diligently study them, and refuse to examine any
refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself
that the war is just, and will thank God for the
better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque
self-deception.



To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (56445)11/10/2002 2:53:22 PM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 281500
 
However,what may really need to be reevaluated Derek, is what you consider to be the thread's norm.
I have yet to see you try to make a point without an abrasive and/or attacking style of discourse.


I'm sorry you feel that way, and sincerely apologize if I've come on too strong.

Derek