Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (4791)	11/10/2002 9:00:53 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

World Com, Enron, Loewen Group, Laidlaw, Lucent, Northern Telecom, Microsoft, Bombardier IBM etc etc.... In Peter's own words he would have handled them all the same way...have you not been paying attention man!! ------- You forgot to list the other 100,000 + securities that are out there. The problem is listing them and showing with real fact or data (past posting links) that I have been caught by any "disasters" in any at all because of my strategy are two very different things. If you can do so go right ahead ----- Quote """The strategy uses regression analysis to set up ranges. These ranges give the likely high ranges , average ranges and low ranges for the security using the securities own past trading numbers. After doing the math of it these ranges are set. When the trading price falls to close to or within the low range one would buy or accumulate on the way down staggering his purchases accordingly. He quite simply would not be buying in the high ranges"" ------ Unless you can show as I said specific mention from me. BARK BARK AWAY. NOTHING YOU CAN SAY OR SHOW WILL CHANGE WHAT WAS GOTTEN WITH NT OF RECENT. READ IT AND WEEP CRY BABIES. -------- Better yet why not show just one documented trade you have done that even comes close to that. Thats all I ask and thats all joe average wants to see. Your documented postings and their documented results. I eagerly await these postings. BUT THEY WILL NEVER SHOW UP WILL THEY.????????????????????????----- Scott please take note of Peter's key phrase.. ""When the trading price falls to close to or within the low range one would buy or accumulate on the way down staggering his purchases accordingly."" ----- These quotes your dishing out are in describing to you my method my strategy that is all. Unless you can show specific mention of my saying them at any time to trades I supposedly have done that you of course have the documented evidence of. Go right ahead. Post them or link them. CANT CAN YOU AND THAT SAYS IT ALL -------- Scott again please note this ... are you paying attention?? ""one would buy or accumulate on the way down staggering his purchases accordingly. "" Now...take that dunce cap off boy and go and meet Warren at the corner of Berkshire and Hathaway. Peter no need to thank me ..just trying to help out. ----- Thank you for what you tried on two seperate occassions to discredit my strategy. One with faulty chart data. The other by missing what I clearly said. If you want to try a third time go right. But do it with real data. I dont see any. Where is it. This from you is just nonsense. All you have is me explaining my strategy. Not one single specific instance documented where any of my trades posted here or anywheres showed disasters. So unless you can show some. As I said your just a cry baby . SO CRY AWAY YOUR NOT HURTING ME OR MY STRATEGY ONE BIT. AND YOUR NOT CONVINCING ANYONE ESPECIALLY THOSE LURKERING HERE. BECAUSE I AM GETTING SOME VERY INTEREST MESSAGES. SEEMS FACT AND DATA ARE OF INTEREST TO A GOOD MANY , WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!------- ------ You say you want to help show joe average here how you get all your superior returns. Lets see the math of it. Lets test it. Lets follow it real time. Like we have followed mine. CANT DELIVER CAN YOU, TOOOO BADDDDD. GUESS THAT SHOWS IT FOR WHAT IT IS --------------