Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (149884)	11/11/2002 7:47:07 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<"The Americans will say ‘That is not enough, that’s not full compliance’. The Russians will say, ‘Let’s wait a minute, maybe they need a little more time’. Then an argument will start in the Security Council on whether or not Iraq is in material breach."> thescotsman.co.uk This is the most likely scenario no matter what Saddam does. That is why the US wanted a resolution with a hair trigger -- the US did not get that kind of resolution because the US began from a position of regime change. The truth is, we want to invade Iraq no matter what and the whole world knows it. The US cannot be trusted to decide if Iraq is or is not in compliance -- that is part of the price we pay for having staked out a regime change policy instead of a disarm or else policy.