Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (154661)	11/11/2002 4:39:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1578704

Al, <There is not a single positive subject I can point to.> Which is exactly why the Democrats lost in 2002. Think about it. Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (154661)	11/11/2002 4:41:46 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578704

A tax break for those who don't need it You believe that? Every taxpayer in the nation gets a rebate of $300/600 and you say they don't "NEED" it!!! WHO IN HELL ARE YOU TO DECIDE WHO DOES AND WHO DOESN'T NEED A TAX BREAK? war Well, at least with this president "war" is a response to a national security threat. I shudder to think what the true underlying reasons for Clinton's war were. no peace in Israel What's THAT got to do with US? Clinton tried to play peacemaker over there, HOPING to get some kind of legacy, only to make matters worse than they already were. The truth of the matter is that Bush had accomplished more BEFORE 9/11 than the previous president did in eight long years. Why aren't you criticizing Clinton?

To: Alighieri who wrote (154661)	11/13/2002 5:49:52 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578704

Al, Just pointing out that if you remove 9/11, this adminstration has NOTHING to its credit...NADA. There were less than 9 months between January 20 and 9/11. The tax cut was IMO a major achievement is such a short time. Without 9/11, there would have been a lot more progress on the domestic front. Things that come to mind is reform of Social Security, tort reform. Imagine, the sleazeball lawyers and their Democrat sponsors may at some point lose the stranglehold on the American economy one day. IMO, that's worth double the trillion tax cut for the economy. The sleazeball laywer/Democrat extortion is costing billions of dollars, jobs and is reducing the economic growth. I think these sleazeballs (the team of elected Democrats / lawyers) are still too strong to attack head on, but look further. In 2004, there will be more Democrats up for re-election than Republicans, some Dem Senators may retire because of old age, or because of lost hope of ever regaining majority, and it may present Republicans an opportunity to increase their majority to lets say 55 or 56. This may provide sufficient base from which to launch assault on the most disgusting part of America - the trial lawyers (and their Democrat sponsors / beneficiaries). Joe

To: Alighieri who wrote (154661)	11/13/2002 5:55:45 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578704

Al, A tax break for those who don't need it Is this the Das Kapital of tax cut? To each according to need, from each according to ability? How about income tax cut to those who pay income taxes? Sounds much more straight forward to me, and apparently to majority of Congressmen and Americans. Joe